Thanks Nate, it works great now…..     Dennis

 

Sent from Mail for Windows

 

From: Nate Bargmann
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 1:33 PM
To: MCARC mailing list
Subject: [MCARC] [Fwd: ARLB002 ARRL Responds to FCC Proposals]

 

----- Forwarded message from ARRL Web site <[email protected]> -----

 

Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 12:51:36 -0500 (EST)

From: ARRL Web site <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Subject: ARLB002 ARRL Responds to FCC Proposals

 

SB QST @ ARL $ARLB002

ARLB002 ARRL Responds to FCC Proposals

 

ZCZC AG02

QST de W1AW 

ARRL Bulletin 2  ARLB002

From ARRL Headquarters 

Newington CT  January 12, 2024

To all radio amateurs

 

SB QST ARL ARLB002

ARLB002 ARRL Responds to FCC Proposals

 

The ARRL responded to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC)

request for comments on removing the symbol (baud) rate restrictions

that apply to data communications on the LF bands and the VHF and

UHF bands below 450 MHz. The FCC also requested comments on the

bandwidth limits applicable to those bands.

 

The FCC's action follows their 2023 decision to remove the symbol

(baud) rate limits on the 160- to 10-meter amateur bands. Those

limits were replaced with a 2.8 kHz bandwidth limit, a move ARRL had

long advocated for.

 

The FCC's Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking sought comments on

updating the other amateur bands on which its symbol (baud) rate

limits continue to throttle faster data rates. The subject bands are

the LF bands (2200 and 630 meters) and the VHF and UHF bands below

450 MHz. In its comments, ARRL strongly agreed with the FCC's

proposal to remove the symbol (baud) rate limits on the remaining

bands.

 

ARRL's comments also noted that CW operation is protected in the

lower 100 kHz of the 6- and 2-meter bands and will continue to be so

protected, but otherwise, all modes are permitted in the remainder

of the subject VHF and UHF bands with only the data modes subject to

bandwidth restrictions below 450 MHz that vary by band. The

bandwidth restrictions uniquely applicable to data modes have

resulted in the other modes being permitted to use many times the

bandwidth of data modes in an intermixed fashion determined by those

using the bands. For the data modes, however, the limits have

limited experimentation with techniques already in use in other

countries on amateur VHF and UHF bands.

 

ARRL concluded that the FCC should also remove the bandwidth limits

that apply uniquely to the data modes on the subject bands, and

instead, amateurs rely on voluntary band plans and local agreements,

as they already do with regard to the mix of the other modes ranging

from Morse code (CW) signals of 50 Hz or so (depending upon speed)

to amateur television that employs signals of 6 or more MHz. ARRL

also noted that the limited propagation range on the subject bands

enables local cooperation that is not possible on the HF bands where

propagation is such that signals can cover the globe.

 

The bands addressed in this rulemaking are:

 

* 135.7 - 137.8 kHz (2200-meter) and 472 - 479 kHz (630-meter)

bands.

 

* 50.1 - 54 MHz (6-meter) and 144.1 - 148 MHz (2-meter) bands.

 

* 219 - 220 MHz (1.25-meter digital) bands.

 

* 222 - 225 MHz (1.25-meter) and 420 - 450 MHz (70-centimeter)

bands.

 

The public period for reply comments remains open until January 22,

2024. An ARRL guide to filing comments is available at,

https://www.arrl.org/arrl-guide-to-filing-comments-with-fcc .

NNNN

/EX

 

----- End forwarded message -----

 

--

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all

possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."

Web: https://www.n0nb.us

Projects: https://github.com/N0NB

GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819