[MCARC] [Fwd: Comment Period to be Re-Opened on Forest Service Fees]

[Nate Bargmann]

----- Forwarded message from ARRL Members Only Web site <memberlist at arrl.org> -----

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:16:16 -0500 (EST)
From: ARRL Members Only Web site <memberlist at arrl.org>
To: n0nb at n0nb.us
Subject: Comment Period to be Re-Opened on Forest Service Fees

Repeater owners in the Division who have their systems on U.S. Forest
Service properties are facing the possibility of a new fee levied by the
service.  There was a comment period on the proposal that recently
ended.  Because of the strong feed-back, that comment period will be
reopened.  Here are the relevant parts of an email I received from the
ARRL Washington Counsel, David Siddall, K3ZJ.  I am forwarding this with
his permission.

********************
The Forest Service sent a Notice to the Federal Register yesterday
announcing that they will re-open the window for comments on the
proposed new $1400. annual administrative fee.  This means that amateurs
that may have missed the earlier comment period, or who wish to file
additional arguments and information, can submit new filings between
March 1 and March 31.   A copy of the Notice to be published on March 1
is here: https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2022-04254.pdf. 
(This is completely public information.)

I notice that in several of the amateur comments sent me that there
appears some confusion.  The proposed fee is a new and separate fee, not
an increase to fees (such as rent) already being paid.  If adopted, the
existing fee(s) – which generally have been around $130-140 annually
for amateur uses – would have to be paid in addition to the new
proposed annual administrative fee of $1400.  IMHO, the fee would be so
high because the proposal is to include amateur uses equally with those
of commercial wireless entities such as broadcasters, cellular providers
and broadband entities that require a much more significant presence and
greater Forest Service support than amateurs.  

73, Dave K3ZJ
********************

The ARRL commented strongly in opposition to the proposal.


73, Art K0AIZ
 

 

 

David R. Siddall

--------------------------------------------------------------------
ARRL Midwest Division
Director: Arthur I Zygielbaum, K0AIZ
k0aiz at arrl.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."
Web: https://www.n0nb.us
Projects: https://github.com/N0NB
GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mcarc/attachments/20220228/baca49e2/attachment.sig>