[MCARC] Brk

Thu May 28 20:45:38 EDT 2020

I will talk to Jerry (Mayor) again and see if I can find out who we need to get permission from.  I think it would be OK with him but I think we need to touch base with the city superintendent and maybe the land owner.  I don’t know if Mike M. (KAØDQP) is reading this thread but I would be interested in knowing if the city has an antenna there and also does the county.

Also, have we determined who owns the tower itself?  I assume Blue Valley.

If we have to choose between Packet and 147.285+ repeater, I also vote for the 285 repeater.

Dave

> On May 28, 2020, at 7:12 PM, Farren Constable <farren at computershed.com> wrote:
> 
> >> So, we have the possibility of using an existing commercial VHF antenna
> >> and/or putting a ham antenna up there.  I say both!  the .285 repeater and
> >> a club digipeater.
> 
> >There would be too much desense each way unless there is substantial
> >vertical separation of the antennas.
> 
> True, but how often would that really happen with our typical usage of both systems?  My guess is it would be pretty rare....
> 
> Question:  what packet frequency was BRK on?  145.010?   If not, I vote for .010 if we put packet back up there....
> 
> If we can only have one, I vote for the .285 repeater....
> 
> -Farren
> 
> The Computer Shed
> Business Computer Services
> 785.747.8100
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:46 PM Nate Bargmann <n0nb at n0nb.us <mailto:n0nb at n0nb.us>> wrote:
> * On 2020 28 May 18:31 -0500, Farren Constable wrote:
> > All:
> > 
> > I just had a very nice phone conversation with Rick Stoll from BVT.  I
> > shall attempt to summarize:
> > 
> > 
> >    - He knew all about the accidental removal of the clubs antenna. He said
> >    it was in the process of falling off already when they took it down.
> >    - He's willing to install another antenna for us as long as we provide
> >    it and all the PROPER mounting equipment.  He's not going to do a "duck
> >    tape and bailing wire" job.
> >    - (I think we should still get City approval, but that's just me. Maybe
> >    it's a "what they don't know won't hurt them" thing?)
> >    - He said the City used to have an equipment cabinet up there but he's
> >    not sure what's in it.  BVT's cabinet is full.
> >    - (Dennis: is the City's cabinet where the packet gear was located?)
> >    - He said they have some old power supply cabinets "in a pile out back"
> >    that we might could adopt one if it would be large enough.
> >    - The DB224 antenna that was offered isn't BVT's. It was just something
> >    still on the tower that wasn't being used so they offered it, but it's not
> >    really theirs to offer. My thought on that is that if somebody comes along
> >    years from now and wants their antenna back, we'll worry about that then
> >    and in the meantime we may as well get some good out of it.  He didn't
> >    remember about feedline from that antenna.
> >    - When I asked about the possibility of getting an Internet connection
> >    up there for remote-control of the repeater, he said "may.....be.......".
> >    I don't know if the controller even has that feature, I just thought I'd
> >    ask about getting Internet.
> 
> You're reading my mind...
> 
> The controller won't but there are plenty of Raspberry Pis around and
> AllStarLink would be interesting.
> 
> https://www.allstarlink.org/ <https://www.allstarlink.org/>
> 
> > So, we have the possibility of using an existing commercial VHF antenna
> > and/or putting a ham antenna up there.  I say both!  the .285 repeater and
> > a club digipeater.
> 
> There would be too much desense each way unless there is substantial
> vertical separation of the antennas.
> 
> > If there's existing coax to the DB224, I've got a RigExpert AA-600 that'll
> > make quick work of telling us where that antenna is at.....
> 
> I've got the AA-230 ZOOM as well and have AntScope2 all loaded and
> ready...
> 
> > Dave, can I leave it to you to talk to the City people about us going up
> > there on a recon mission?
> > 
> > I'll be the BVT contact person.
> 
> Thanks, Farren.
> 
> 73, Nate
> 
> -- 
> 
> "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
> possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."
> 
> Web: https://www.n0nb.us <https://www.n0nb.us/>
> Projects: https://github.com/N0NB <https://github.com/N0NB>
> GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> MCARC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mcarc <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mcarc>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm <http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>
> Post: mailto:MCARC at mailman.qth.net <mailto:MCARC at mailman.qth.net>
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net <http://www.qsl.net/>
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html <http://www.qsl.net/donate.html>______________________________________________________________
> MCARC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mcarc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MCARC at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mcarc/attachments/20200528/533fb4ca/attachment-0001.html>