[Lowfer] Lowfer TAG
John Andrews
w1tag at charter.net
Sun Sep 24 19:10:31 EDT 2023
I fired up Lowfer TAG from Raymond, ME on 185.302 kHz, sending TAG in
QRSS60 this weekend. I have rebuilt the tuning unit at the feedpoint to
the loop antenna. The plastic enclosure on the old one was being held
together by duct tape. I also found that some of the capacitors used to
tune the loop had developed a little series resistance, as measured on
an RF bridge. The end result was slightly higher antenna current, but
not enough to make much difference.
I will probably let it run for about a week, unless I advise otherwise
here. Reports, though possibly unlikely, would be appreciated.
Regarding the capacitors, a little old-time AM broadcast lore: I used to
work for a 5 kW AM station (WTAG), and the 4-tower directional array was
fed through tuning networks dating back to 1939. The capacitors were old
micas, ranging from G1 to G4 in size. From time to time, a cap would
overheat and die, sometimes explosively. To avert such a calamity, we
began checking for mild heating, and testing suspected problem caps with
our General Radio 516 RF impedance bridge. The rule of thumb was that
any cap showing more than 0.1 Ohm of RF resistance was replaced. That
greatly reduced the incidence of failures.
When I originally built TAG's first tuning network, I checked the mica
capacitors, and used ones that met that criterion. But after many years
of operation, I found this month that a .005 uF showed 0.3 Ohms, and a
.001 uF showed 0.2 Ohms. When you are dealing with a loop with only 1.4
Ohms of RF resistance, that's not a good thing. So I replaced the mica
caps, and put in a spare 1000 pF vacuum-variable in place of an old
3-ganger. The resistance of the net 7000 pF tuning is now definitely
under 0.1 Ohms.
As W1VD can testify, this is not your average RF impedance bridge, and
is capable of fine work. My experience with VNA's has been a little
mixed with high reactances at LF, so I'm sticking with the bridge.
Of course, most LF work is done with loaded verticals, not loops, so
stuff like this is not of much interest. However, here in the Maine
woods with 100' tall pine trees all around, the losses with verticals
are huge, hence the loopiness I picked up from the late Bill Ashlock.
John, W1TAG
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list