[Lowfer] EAR in TN

[lmlangenfeld]

Jeepers ... and I thought it was me. I guess I can take some backhanded comfort in that everyone is struggling a bit.When things are "on" here, SIW, WM and EAR (the "reliables") are easy copy. The latter two, however, seem far more subject to deep, long-period QSB than has been the norm. When they're at the bottom, there's no sign of them. Comparatively nearby SIW, not surprisingly, is  largely unaffected.Mark -- WA9ETW -- EN52fsSent from my  U.S.Cellular© Smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: John Bruce McCreath <weazle at hurontel.on.ca> Date: 11/29/22  11:14 AM  (GMT-06:00) To: Andy - KU4XR <ku4xr at yahoo.com>, "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European,	& UK) and MedFer bands" <lowfer at mailman.qth.net> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] EAR in TN Hi Andy…..thanks for the report and Argo screen shot.  Propagation has beenvery bizarre for the last few weeks.  I’m not having much luck with my NavtexDXing, aside from NMR, San Juan, Puerto Rico being fairly consistent.I’ve set up a SID detection system using a 1 metre square, 25 turn loop fed toan audio interface (an external sound card) and Spectrum Lab as my VLF rx,but have been plagued with on again, off again noise…..GGRRR!I’ll keep EAR pluggin’ away, just for guys like you who send me a report oncein a while!73, J.B., VE3EAR______________________________________________________________Lowfer mailing listHome: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowferHelp: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.netPost must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html