[Lowfer] lowFERs on 10-29-20

[jrusgrove at comcast.net]

John, Garry

If the RG-8 was old and cruddy the difference would be less than 3.77 dB and work in Garry's favor. Garry ... about how many lines did it take to get copy in the past?

Jay W1VD


----- Original Message -----
From: John Andrews <w1tag at charter.net>
Reply-To: Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
To: <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: 10/30/2020 7:39:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] lowFERs on 10-29-20
________________________________________________________________________________

Garry,

I can confirm that it's on the air, and probably weaker here at 135 
miles than it used to be. The wire change that Jay mentioned could mean 
4-5 dB, depending on the health of that very old RG-8 braid used 
earlier. I was unsure of the health of one treetops involved in 
supporting the thing, and decided to use the #12 wire this winter.

Maybe the winter will be kind to your efforts.

John, W1TAG

On 10/30/2020 6:17 PM, Garry wrote:
> Andy, thanks for looking. Sorry I can't slow the ramp speed down more in 
> for the visual callsign. Maybe one of these days I'll get a newer 
> Ultimate3S with more control.
> 
> I've been looking for TAG also with not even a hint of decode. Strange 
> since years ago it came through even in September. I did learn that the 
> very old wolf gui code can have issues when run on a Windows 7 PC. When 
> I ran it to measure the frequency on one of my PCs the result jumped all 
> over the place. The source was a GPS-locked SLM thanks to W1VD and the 
> signal was solid on Spectrum Laboratory. I found that if I ran the 
> program with administrator privileges the frequency measurement was 
> stable. I also found it worked fine when run as a regular user but with 
> compatibility mode set to Windows XP, SP2. That's what my PC was years 
> ago. Just in case there was still an issue with Windows 7 I ran last 
> night using my old Windows XP laptop. Same result - f=0.000 solidly when 
> calibrating but no hint of decode even integrating over 32 96-second 
> periods. I do currently have a weak spur up several Hz from 185.8 kHz 
> but don't see why that should matter.
______________________________________________________________
Lowfer mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html