[Lowfer] [EXTERNAL]Re: SAQ in CT

[Howell, Laurence J]

Correction was using Jays design on the modified AMRAD probe for SAQ, not the L400b which was assigned for Ron on 75kHZ



> On Jul 3, 2016, at 08:40, Laurence KL7 L <hellozerohellozero at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> About the same levels here Jay - the 2nd sitting at 12Z was a little easier on the ears. 
> 
> About 20dB above average noise in 200Hz between cracks - so Im going to give it 459. I had the NB a little tight so some clipping.
> 
> I knew it was going to be ok as GBZs  in UK MSFK close to 19kHz was visible weakly early next to a very strong NWC
> 
> 
> Laurence KL7L
> L400b/Speclabs/Audiocity
> 
> http://kl7l.com/saq3rdjuly160904z.jpg
> 
> 
> 
>> From: jrusgrove at comcast.net
>> To: lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:52:40 -0400
>> Subject: [Lowfer] SAQ in CT
>> 
>> Received both SAQ 17.2 kHz transmissions here this morning ... the second session won out due to 
>> lower static levels. I'd rate readability as normal to slightly above normal compared to numerous 
>> previous receptions. A short .mp3, with clips from the tuneup period and message can be found at:
>> 
>> http://www.w1vd.com/SAQ070316.mp3
>                         
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html