[Lowfer] EAR, MLS, TH
John Andrews
w1tag at charter.net
Mon Dec 12 09:43:42 EST 2016
Mike, Garry,
Back in the day, I spent a lot of time chasing TH and NWNJ. The latter
was a LOT harder. The best approach was to record WAV files at likely
successful times of day and night, and then do the detective work later.
Ultimately, you could use a narrow CW filter and listen to promising
sections of the file.
I also recall building an 8052-based QRSS keyer for TH, and sending it
to him. Think it had dipswitches for messages and speeds. Carl was
pretty well set in his ways, though, so the beacon stayed on CW. As I
recall, TH had an uh, errr, ahhh... "power change" at sunset. Don't ask,
don't tell!
I'll have to do some recordings this week, and see if anything can be
teased out up here. The awful racket down there may ease up when a
certain neighbor finally goes to bed in the wee hours.
John, W1TAG
On 12/12/2016 9:06 AM, Michael Sapp wrote:
> Garry: Yes, the long message on TH does make it a challenge to capture
> an ID
> when the fading is short interval. Being closer seems to help as I seem to
> be just far enough away for a 1-hop D or E layer path. Not much overnight
> here on WSPR2 with nothing heard from NW or XCR on 630. XND was 10dB
> weaker
> than normal but I still managed 100 or so XND captures overnight. The
> freezing rain made for higher atmospheric noise here overnight on both
> 630/2200m
>
> 73, Mike tts
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Garry" <k3siw at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "lowfer list" <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 8:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] EAR, MLS, TH
>
>
>> Mike, thanks for the report. I got home a bit after 0400Z to find
>> another 1/2 foot of snow on the driveway. Perhaps it helped. I Found TH
>> using QRSS10, slow immediately. Switched to QRSS3, slow and TH was in
>> and out, but never truly readable, until 0900Z when I moved on to other
>> things. Perhaps a sunrise boost would have made the long message
>> obvious, at least in places, but happy to see it as well as I did. I did
>> note that on 474.2 kHz WSPR signals from New England and Ontario
>> stations were stronger than usual.
>>
>> 73, Garry, K3SIW, EN52ta, Elgin, IL
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Lowfer mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list