[Lowfer] 135.95 kHz MSFSK

[Steve]

Yes...the other two are transmitting at present. Both are stronger than the 
135.9 signal so you may well be correct. VE7BDQ had a southerly null but 
mine was very sharp and deep at 73 degrees. Will do some more checking again 
tomorrow. The other possibility is that they are not at full power and 
running lower than the other two which I believe are waaay up there in terms 
of WRP.


Steve



> Is Matsqui still using 76.2 and 124.0 kHz (it was in 2013 when I was 
> there).
> How does bearing compare against those???   I cannot hear them ever hear 
> in
> VA but have heard NPG on 135.95 here back the 90's and do hear it now.  I
> still suspect NPG.
>
> --
> David L. Wilson
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lowfer [mailto:lowfer-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Larry
>> Molitor via Lowfer
>> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 12:37 PM
>> To: Garry and Linda Hess; Laurence KL7 L; lowfer mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] 135.95 kHz MSFSK
>>
>> Work on my loop continues and hopefully it will be rotatable today or
>> tomorrow. When I can steer the fool thing, I'll be able to get a better
> idea of
>> direction and will report back.
>> My loop nulls are currently at about 50/230 degrees. With that in mind, I
> can't
>> see it being NPG. But then I've been wrong before!!
>> Larry - W7IUV / WH2XGP
>>
>>       From: Garry and Linda Hess <k3siw at sbcglobal.net>
>>  To: Larry Molitor <w7iuv at yahoo.com>; Laurence KL7 L
>> <hellozerohellozero at hotmail.com>; lowfer mailing list
>> <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
>>  Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 9:21 AM
>>  Subject: 135.95 kHz MSFSK
>>
>> Larry,
>>
>> That's the signal I reported on the lowfer mailing list at
>> http://mailman.qth.net/. Sounds like it may be very close to you, which 
>> is
>> why it messes up 136 kHz WSPR. Maybe it's in WA instead of NPG in Dixon,
>> CA. NLK has been QRT on it's normal frequency of 24.8 kHz.
>> Perhaps it's now transmitting on 135.95 kHz?
>>
>> I assume Laurence has been hearing it too even though he mentioned 135.6
>> kHz. His heading is more consistent with CA than WA.
>>
>> Using grid squares as follows: K3SIW=EN52ta, WH2XGP=DN07dg,
>> KL7L=BP51ip, NPG=CM98ci, and NLK=CN98ae (these may be a bit in error,
>> but hopefully not by much) I calculate distance/headings to be:
>>
>> K3SIW to NPG=1774.8 mi at 273 deg
>> K3SIW to NLK=1682 mi at 296.3 deg
>>
>> WH2XGP to NPG=624.5 mi at 190.4 deg
>> WH2XGP to NLK=122.5 mi at 302 deg
>>
>> KL7L to NPG=1991.4 mi at 131.2 deg
>> KL7L to NLK=1413.9 mi at 118.6 deg
>>
>> My loop nulls at about 0 and 180 deg are more in line with NPG being the
>> source than NLK, as is Laurence's beam heading. However, the tremendous
>> signal strength at WH2XGP favors NLK being the source. If the source
>> continues transmitting headings from a few others would be helpful.
>>
>> 73, Garry, K3SIW, EN52ta, Elgin, IL
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________
>> ____
>> Lowfer mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook":  http://members.shaw.ca/ve7sl

VE7SL BLOG - "Homebrewing and Operating Adventures From 2200m to Nanowaves": 
http://ve7sl.blogspot.ca/