[Lowfer] 135.95 kHz MSFSK
David L. Wilson
dwilson314 at verizon.net
Fri Sep 11 19:52:43 EDT 2015
Is Matsqui still using 76.2 and 124.0 kHz (it was in 2013 when I was there).
How does bearing compare against those??? I cannot hear them ever hear in
VA but have heard NPG on 135.95 here back the 90's and do hear it now. I
still suspect NPG.
--
David L. Wilson
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lowfer [mailto:lowfer-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Larry
> Molitor via Lowfer
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 12:37 PM
> To: Garry and Linda Hess; Laurence KL7 L; lowfer mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] 135.95 kHz MSFSK
>
> Work on my loop continues and hopefully it will be rotatable today or
> tomorrow. When I can steer the fool thing, I'll be able to get a better
idea of
> direction and will report back.
> My loop nulls are currently at about 50/230 degrees. With that in mind, I
can't
> see it being NPG. But then I've been wrong before!!
> Larry - W7IUV / WH2XGP
>
> From: Garry and Linda Hess <k3siw at sbcglobal.net>
> To: Larry Molitor <w7iuv at yahoo.com>; Laurence KL7 L
> <hellozerohellozero at hotmail.com>; lowfer mailing list
> <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 9:21 AM
> Subject: 135.95 kHz MSFSK
>
> Larry,
>
> That's the signal I reported on the lowfer mailing list at
> http://mailman.qth.net/. Sounds like it may be very close to you, which is
> why it messes up 136 kHz WSPR. Maybe it's in WA instead of NPG in Dixon,
> CA. NLK has been QRT on it's normal frequency of 24.8 kHz.
> Perhaps it's now transmitting on 135.95 kHz?
>
> I assume Laurence has been hearing it too even though he mentioned 135.6
> kHz. His heading is more consistent with CA than WA.
>
> Using grid squares as follows: K3SIW=EN52ta, WH2XGP=DN07dg,
> KL7L=BP51ip, NPG=CM98ci, and NLK=CN98ae (these may be a bit in error,
> but hopefully not by much) I calculate distance/headings to be:
>
> K3SIW to NPG=1774.8 mi at 273 deg
> K3SIW to NLK=1682 mi at 296.3 deg
>
> WH2XGP to NPG=624.5 mi at 190.4 deg
> WH2XGP to NLK=122.5 mi at 302 deg
>
> KL7L to NPG=1991.4 mi at 131.2 deg
> KL7L to NLK=1413.9 mi at 118.6 deg
>
> My loop nulls at about 0 and 180 deg are more in line with NPG being the
> source than NLK, as is Laurence's beam heading. However, the tremendous
> signal strength at WH2XGP favors NLK being the source. If the source
> continues transmitting headings from a few others would be helpful.
>
> 73, Garry, K3SIW, EN52ta, Elgin, IL
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> ____
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list