[Lowfer] WH2XRR & N8TL

n8tl n8tl at woh.rr.com
Sat Oct 17 09:55:20 EDT 2015


Well...whoopie!!!  I didn't check WSPRNET.  I didn't see it on my wsprx 
printout.  I sent Bill an email to find out if he can do wspr15 mode.  
Let's see what he
comes back with.  Thanks Mike for the revelation!!

Tom N8TL


On 15-10-17 01:37 PM, Michael Sapp wrote:
> Tom: Turns out you did have a WH2XRR capture...
>
> 2015-10-17 10:08   WH2XRR   0.137551   -33   0   FM18re   0.005 N8TL 
> EN81db   692   300
>
> I did a wspr dbase search by distance and it popped out of the 
> results....
>
> 73 Mike wa3tts
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "n8tl" <n8tl at woh.rr.com>
> To: <"k3siw at sbcglobal.net; lowfer"@mailman.qth.net>; "Discussion of 
> the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands" 
> <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 8:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] XRR & carrier signal
>
>
>> Mike and Gary:
>>
>> Same results here in NW Ohio.  Copy on WG2XXM and WH2XND were 
>> good....but, no WH2XXR.   I would like someone to adopt WSPR15 as 
>> transmit mode here
>> in the states!!
>>
>> 0554  -29  -0.8    0.137510    0   WG2XXM        EM15     23 (Ken K5DNL)
>> 0650  -25  -0.2    0.137500    0   WH2XND        DM33     30 (Ron NI7J)
>>
>> Tom N8TL
>>
>> On 15-10-16 10:05 PM, Garry Hess wrote:
>>> Mike, I see that dual carrier signal on 137.6 kHz here too. But the 
>>> signal I was referring to was at about 135.95 kHz and looked 
>>> somewhat like the big Navy signals down below 30 kHz. NPG used to 
>>> send on that frequency as well as 55.5 kHz. I know the latter 
>>> frequency has been used for some sort of GPS backup scheme so 
>>> perhaps the former frequency has been used as well. Whatever it was 
>>> it disappeared into the noise an hour or so after local sunrise. 
>>> Perhaps I'll see it again tonight.
>>>
>>> Groundwave is decent here on 136 kHz WSPR2. At 600 miles WG2XXM has 
>>> decoded a couple of time in the few minutes I've been monitoring. No 
>>> hint of WH2XXR last night while WH2XND was decent. Can't help but 
>>> wonder if WSPR15 would have been able to decode XXR.
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Lowfer mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>



More information about the Lowfer mailing list