[Lowfer] 136 KHz Opera
Garry Hess
k3siw at sbcglobal.net
Thu Jan 8 07:52:35 EST 2015
There was more opera32 activity on 136 kHz last night so a second
comparison of v1.5.5 vs DF6NM deep search was made. Unfortunately, while
reception was simultaneous, the antennas were different. Eprobes fed
both sdr-iq receivers, but the one used for v1.5.5 is known to be a bit
more sensitive than the other at LF.
Decodes for v1.5.5 were:
11:13 136 VO1NA Op32 Deep Search -41 dB
10:38 136 VO1NA Op32 Deep Search -41 dB
10:03 136 VO1NA Op32 -38 dB |---------| Fade: 3%
09:28 136 VO1NA Op32 Deep Search -42 dB
08:53 136 VO1NA Op32 Deep Search -42 dB
07:08 136 VO1NA Op32 Deep Search -43 dB
06:33 136 VO1NA Op32 Deep Search -41 dB
05:58 136 VO1NA Op32 Deep Search -42 dB
05:23 136 VO1NA Op32 Deep Search -42 dB
04:48 136 VO1NA Op32 Deep Search -42 dB
01:04 136 WD2XNS Op32 -16 dB |---------| Fade: 0%
00:32 136 WD2XNS Op32 -17 dB |---------| Fade: 0%
00:08 136 VO1NA Op32 Deep Search -40 dB
*********** 08/01/2015 ***********
23:59 136 WD2XNS Op32 -21 dB |---------| Fade: 0%
23:33 136 VO1NA Op32 Deep Search -40 dB
23:26 136 WD2XNS Op32 -22 dB |---------| Fade: 0%
*********** 07/01/2015 ***********
Detections for DF6NM deep search were:
2015-01-08 10:38:54 VO1NA 2836km 137476.981Hz 12mHz -48.1dBOp 94% 16.6dB
2015-01-08 10:03:53 VO1NA 2836km 137476.978Hz 2mHz -48.9dBOp 98% 16.4dB
2015-01-08 04:48:52 VO1NA 2836km 137476.999Hz 17mHz -49.2dBOp 94% 16.0dB
2015-01-08 01:37:48 WD2XNS 1268km 137479.996Hz 3mHz -24.3dBOp 97% 16.4dB
2015-01-08 01:05:03 WD2XNS 1268km 137479.996Hz 2mHz -23.0dBOp 100% 20.7dB
2015-01-08 00:32:15 WD2XNS 1268km 137479.999Hz 5mHz -21.3dBOp 93% 20.8dB
2015-01-08 00:08:48 VO1NA 2836km 137477.004Hz 3mHz -49.3dBOp 94% 17.2dB
2015-01-07 23:59:29 WD2XNS 1268km 137480.003Hz 1mHz -28.0dBOp 92% 21.2dB
2015-01-07 23:33:47 VO1NA 2836km 137477.004Hz 3mHz -45.9dBOp 97% 16.2dB
2015-01-07 23:26:44 WD2XNS 1268km 137480.003Hz 3mHz -28.3dBOp 100% 21.4dB
2015-01-07 22:58:46 VO1NA 2836km 137477.001Hz 4mHz -47.1dBOp 94% 16.7dB
Last night was very cold here (-11F) and the noise floor was raised
compared to the previous night. Thus, VO1NA generally required "deep
search" detection with v1.5.5 and that code yielded more detections than
the DF6NM code. As mentioned earlier that was at least to some extent
because the former receive setup was more sensitive than the latter.
Neither code gave any falses, but I noticed that v1.5.5 produced "03:09
136 UW8SM de WD4KPD Op32 Deep Search 7863 km -43 dB in WASHINGTON,
NC. with 0.1w + T-ant." Indeed UW8SM was active earlier in the evening
but this was almost certainly a false because no Europeans reported
reception at that time.
Next time I'll switch the eprobes and see what happens.
--
73, Garry, K3SIW, EN52ta, Elgin, IL
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list