[Lowfer] Antenna Analyser Mod?
Cliff Sojourner
cls at employees.org
Fri Dec 11 12:06:37 EST 2015
hi Kurt,
On 2015-12-10 21:18, KD7JYK DM09 wrote:
> : hi John, thanks for the encouragement from your web pages. Today I
> : modified my '249 with a switch and 940uH inline. the '249 board gives
> : even easier access to the switch than the '259.
> : Why 940uH? because 470uH wasn't enough and 470s are all I had here.
>
> Thinking of getting a variable inductor for my mod so I can add another
> "band" from x-KHz to the current low end of 1.8 MHz using the current
> capacitor to tune. I don't need to go too low right now, just something I'm
> thinking about...
that's a great idea. I thought about installing a 3 or 4 way switch,
didn't find any that were small enough.
>
> Some thoughts... Where do those that have the MFJ-249 think the instability
> is? The only variable appears to be the tuning capacitor. What if, for the
> mod, a fixed capacitor was switched in and a variable inductor used? Any
> chances it would increase stability?
the instability on mine is something like +/- 2kHz. doesn't matter from
1.8MHz on up but matters a lot at 474kHz... 472..476..
the high Q of antennas there means we won't be able to make good
measurements with that kind of "sweep".
have to think this one through, personally I don't think a variable
inductor would be any different. as long as it needs to be variable, we
have no chance to "lock" it to 10MHz or whatever.
>
> Cliff- Can you send me some pics of your mod?
will do - off this list
>
> Kurt
>
Cliff
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list