[Lowfer] DK7FC in EN90xn

Michael Sapp wa3tts at verizon.net
Sat Jan 11 10:33:42 EST 2014


Doug: Even "one" is an accomplishment at a path distance of almost 7,000 km. 
That is almost 500 km farther than my path to DK7FC.

I managed two other captures at 0500 and 0730

2014-01-11 05:00   DK7FC   0.137609   -37   0   JN49ik   +30   1.000 
WA3TTS   EN90xn   6636   4123
2014-01-11 07:00   DK7FC   0.137609   -36   -1   JN49ik   +30   1.000 
WA3TTS   EN90xn   6636   4123

The 0730 sequence started well, then faded about half way through....no 
capture on it....

Soggy condx here seems to really help the noise situation, not to mention my 
neighbor finally took down his "Las Vegas"style blinking and twirling xmas 
lights.....

73,  Mike wa3tts


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Douglas D. Williams" <kb4oer at gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, &amp, UK) and MedFer bands" 
<lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] DK7FC in EN90xn


> Good job, Mike.
>
> I only got one DK7FC decode last night.
>
>
> 2014-01-11 03:30  DK7FC  0.137612  -40  0  JN49ik  1  KB4OER  EM86ui  7096
> 296
>
>
> Grats to Bob on all the stations that decoded his signal. Take a look at
> the LF map on the WSPR web page. Very impressive amount of activity.
>
> I also monitored 136 kHz Opera, with no decodes.
>
> -Doug KB4OER
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Michael Sapp <wa3tts at verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi All:  A first for me thanks to the propagation gods I came within 3dB
>> of a W1VD SNR.....
>>
>>        2014-01-11 01:30   DK7FC   0.137610   -38   0   JN49ik   1 
>> WA3TTS
>>   EN90xn   6636   298
>>        2014-01-11 01:30   DK7FC   0.137611   -10   0   JN49ik   1   G8HUH
>>   IO81mg   851   288
>>        2014-01-11 01:30   DK7FC   0.137610   -35   0   JN49ik   1 
>> WD2XNS
>>   FN31ls   6099   295
>>
>>
>> http://i1296.photobucket.com/albums/ag19/wa3tts/7fcj1014_zpse64b8935.jpg
>>
>> I started out the evening missing 22 dB of signal level. It warmed up 
>> here
>> and an RG-6 F-connection must have "moved" on the transmission line.
>>
>> Quick resistance check showed high ohms, applied 24VDC via a resistor to
>> the transmission line and it came back to the usual ohms reading.  XEB 
>> went
>> from -21 to +1....
>>
>> Quiet tonite with light rain & mist, hope it stays that way....
>>
>> 73  Mike wa3tts
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Lowfer mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 



More information about the Lowfer mailing list