[Lowfer] MX (VO1NA) in EN90xn

Michael Sapp wa3tts at verizon.net
Mon Dec 29 11:55:44 EST 2014


Gary: Thanks for the update.   I did notice that MX was coming through on 
Stefan's grabber last evening around the same time as my MX capture.  A day 
earlier,
SIW was also a reasonable copy in QRSS60 on the morning of the 28th after 
0600UTC or so through mid-day....

https://www.dropbox.com/s/qeey0wq5u3wgnvu/capt00049.jpg?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/t47jnrj41mphtqm/capt00052.jpg?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/u2icgqdbl77coh0/SIW1228.JPG?dl=0

    No sign of WM lately, but the LF/MF propagation was not so great last 
week. 630M WSPR2 signals were robust to the SW last nite and I had one 
decode of XSH/20 just before sunrise...although it did not seem to upload to 
the database for some reason....

    I completed and installed the second F82-75 binocular transformer for my 
EWE antenna over the weekend and it shows ~.1dB insertion loss at 17.2 kHz 
after subracting jumper cable loss.

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/n5h8c860fuhoal2/IMG_4171.JPG?dl=0

    Since I had the other pair of BN73-202 10.5:1 transformers (one for each 
end of the antenna) for the LF/MF EWE antenna out of service, I ran a 
back-to-back transformer insertion loss test....they seemed to survive the 
nearby summer lightning strikes OK and the numbers were not that different 
when I tested them "new" with an old Booton RF voltmeter and signal 
generator.  Rather obvious why I had no copy on Dex's 8820 signal earlier in 
the month....

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/qha5wqbcruew2ek/BN73-202%20Bino%20Xfmr%20SLM%20Test.doc?dl=0


   I will do a 8kHz to 4 MHz back to back test on the F82-75 bino 
transformers sometime this week....


  73, Mike wa3tts



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Garry Hess" <k3siw at sbcglobal.net>
To: "lowfer list" <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] MX (VO1NA) in EN90xn


> Mike, good signals here most of the night from "MX". Thanks for pointing
> out the early new year's activity. While signals from ML were good over
> night here, signals from the west were poor. NDB NY in BC on 350 kHz
> didn't show up until near local sunrise, while DF in NL was good all 
> night.
>
> Up at the lowfer watering hole saw SJ drifting around as local sunrise
> neared. No WM but do see a relatively steady carrier at 185.3013 kHz on
> one of my two eprobes. Perhaps WM without visual modulation or maybe a
> new spurious signal.
> -- 
> 73, Garry, K3SIW, EN52ta, Elgin, IL
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 



More information about the Lowfer mailing list