[Lowfer] Last Chance on 136 kHz Rulemaking
John Andrews
w1tag at charter.net
Sun Mar 24 21:28:05 EDT 2013
Bill,
> I thought to send them my own two cents but I have yet to dial my RAK
> down there and actually search for any signals. My own impression is
> there is QRSS and WSPR down there. I have never succeeded in copying
> either of those on higher frequency bands that I can access more easily.
> Did I miss something (not paying enough attention)? Are you fellows
> using more conventional modes at least part of the time?
Yes, we are. I have had any number of CW QSO's with the few other Part 5
stations that are within earshot (say, a few hundred miles). Within that
answer lies the problem, though. This is not (currently) a ham band.
There is a very small pool of those licensed and able to transmit. Even
the receiving operators are pretty spread out. Add to this the lousy
transmitting antenna efficiencies typical from one's back yard at
wavelengths over a mile, and there are some real limitations.
This has led to a domination of weak-signal modes designed to allow copy
over greater distances. The hope is that with a greater number of
operators the "more conventional modes" will be possible. Your RAK and a
decent receiving antenna should be more than capable of copying CW at
137 kHz when it is used. I really hope you get the chance!
John, W1TAG
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list