[Lowfer] DK7FC WSPR-15
Eric NO3M
no3m at no3m.net
Sat Jan 19 13:36:17 EST 2013
My reception of DK7FC vastly improved when I switched from my NE
to SW beverage array. Seems like pattern reversal. I discovered
that accidentally when switching antennas listening for replies
to CQs on 600m (RX path split w/ rig monitoring 2200M). Suddenly
DK7FC waterfall trace was much stronger.
73 - Eric NO3M, WG2XJM
On 01/19/13 09:28, jrusgrove at comcast.net wrote:
>> Jay may be able to shed some light on this, but I had the
>> unusual situation last night of producing better SNR reports
>> on DK7FC than Jay. That's not normal!
>
> Have had this happen ocassionally in the past ... with other
> receiving stations as well. The most likely explanation
> involves antenna patterns and thunderstorms.
>
> Last night, as a good example, I didn't notice anyone
> complaining about lightning static even though I was
> experiencing moderate, to at times, above moderate static
> levels. A look at the lightning map gave a good indication of
> the likely culprit ... check out the area in yellow circle at
>
> http://www.w1vd.com/Tstorm.gif .
>
> The antenna in use at W1TAG (box loop ... assuming it's the
> same old antenna!) with a figure 8 pattern places a fairly wide
> null in the direction of the yellow circle when aimed at EU. On
> the other hand, the K9AY in use at W1VD has a cardiod pattern
> with the response down only several dB in the direction of the
> yellow circle due to large frontal lobe. A quick comparison of
> the two patterns at
>
> http://www.w1vd.com/Figure8Cardioid.pdf .
>
> I verified this hypothesis (so I guess now it's a theory) a
> couple years back by installing a large single turn
> unterminated loop (figure 8 pattern) orientated toward EU for
> comparison to the K9AY. On nights when thunderstorms develop in
> that area I'm not surprised to take a back seat while using the
> K9AY.
>
> Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
>
>
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list