No subject

5kHz to
490kHz would be better suited for amateur radio use based on our PLC freque=
ncy
allocation.

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:25 PM, JD <listread at lwca.org> wrote:
>>>>On a side note - the utilities pretty much said they would be fine with=
 a
>>>>ham allocation at 73 kHz and 600M so that is good going forward.
>
> Actually, UTC made it clear they don't want ANY new users between 9 and 4=
90
> kHz.  How much ground we gain or lose against the power companies in this
> proceeding will partly determine how hard it is to get 630 meters, I
> suspect.
>
> John
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html