[Lowfer] First decode of the night!
Bob Raide
rjraide at hotmail.com
Wed Dec 11 22:58:41 EST 2013
JD;
No QRT here. Been very successful night so far and still cranking away. Getting Euros and West Coast during same time periods.
I think some of the Europeans still have some issues with WSPR 15 to work out. OPERA Is the mode of choice in UK/Europe.
Hartmut told me he has had an issue with WSPR 15 and is working on getting it to work.
For first night I am over 100 decodes so far and still two or three hours to go-looks like you did well too-73, Bob
From: listread at lwca.org
To: lowfer at mailman.qth.net
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:48:15 -0600
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] First decode of the night!
Attached are tonight's spots here in SE Kansas, Bob. When I thaw out a bit,
I'll retrieve the series of 10-second Argo captures I made simultaneously so
I can do more detailed comparisons of signal levels with the different
receiver filter configurations I was testing during the evening.
A preliminary summary: From 2215 to sunset at 2300, signal level was
moderate and noise was very low. Despite the sub-noise indications in the
arbitrary WSPR noise bandwidth, the signal was consistently 23-25 dB above
Gaussian noise in the detection bandwidth. The signal and background noise
were both just below AGC threshold, with occasional static crashes to S5
that did not bother either WSPR or the Argo runs.
Immediately after sunset, your signal began to grow even stronger, as
reflected in the greatly improved SNRr 90 minutes later. The numbers
gradually deteriorated again due to an increase in static, which had grown
to consistent S3 levels with peaks to S9 by the 0045 slot.
At that point, I began my filter experiments. I had a lot more racket
coming out of the receiver for the next three decodes, but WSPR-15 was
actually happier with it, apparently. It'll be interesting to observe it
some more in future and see if I can understand better how its AGC works.
Just at the start of the 0145 slot I switched back to my original
configuration to see if the less noisy way would still report a worse SNRr,
and it did.
At 0200, I wanted to do one more test in CW mode, fibbing to the software
about the dial and BFO to make the carrier show correctly while using the
receiver in its preferred mode. That took several minutes, so I used the
rest of the 0200 slot to also check the receiver frequency calibration and
the computer time. When I got done and tuned back in, though, there was
nothing on the waterfall or Argo. Didn't know if you had gone QRT or if my
mental arithmetic was that far off, or what...but my toes, nose, and hands
were all telling me it was time to give up and get warm anyway!
By the way, Argo showed a splendid signal from you all the way up to
0200...in 10 second mode, in 3-second mode when I tried that one, and most
of the time also in NDB mode! The latter was broken up by static from time
to time, as one might expect. This band has amazing properties! I'm
delighted that Roger had such great success with it tonight. We need more
westerners participating, both at 4000 and 2200 meters, to get a better
picture of how LF works domestically at amateur power levels.
73
John
______________________________________________________________
Lowfer mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list