[Lowfer] XRS3 reception in NC, RX antenna

[Howell, Laurence J]

Im hoping to rebuild the 10 footer I had in my previous stay in Alaska too  Dex before the first snows come, and at least have it available in the Arsenal. 

My difficulty is where to plonk it..I really need to "shade it" from the Horrid Nor Nor Easters I get off the lake so I think its going to be "hi ho hi ho it's off to the woods with my chain saw I go" and cut out a little real estate.


Ps My Snappers are off line at the moment as the "shack" is being used for other purposes and the noise of the intermittent forced are cooling is keeping its occupants awake.


Laurence KL7L


-----Original Message-----
From: lowfer-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:lowfer-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dexter McIntyre W4DEX
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 5:18 AM
To: Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands
Subject: [EXTERNAL][Lowfer] XRS3 reception in NC, RX antenna

Over several years of receiving weak signals on 500 and 137 kHz I have 
observed the difference between using either my tuned transmit antennas, 
active antennas or the simple vertical wire supported by a tree some 
distance from the house.  All comparisons have significantly favored the 
vertical wire.  I know active antennas can work well but I have never 
had one mounted in an open area or high enough to clear the trees to 
work well.  On yesterday's reception of John's 72.399 kHz the tuned 
transmit antenna produced good copy, much better than with the vertical 
wire in the woods.  With the vertical wire connected to the R75 the bar 
graph S meter was averaging about S5 with static noise.  With the 
transmit antenna the S meter was full scale.  Adding two 20 dB 50 ohm 
attenuators reduce the static level to about the same S5.  40 dB is a 
big difference!

The transmit antenna is located less than ten feet from the house with 
the shack just inside.   I know it picks up noise from the house that 
the vertical wire in the woods does not.  So I was a bit surprised to 
find it received XRS3 much better.  Was the static level so high that it 
masked all local noise?  Even so there seemed to be plenty of signal 
level from the woods antenna so why the big difference in XRS3 
reception?  Maybe this will motivate me to rebuild the old tuned 
balanced loop the I used to receive 73 kHz back when G3AQC was active, 
alive and well.

Dex


______________________________________________________________
Lowfer mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html