[Lowfer] LowFER Grabber and Converter
DnEMoth at aol.com
DnEMoth at aol.com
Mon Sep 24 18:06:43 EDT 2012
I brought mine 24 miles home tied UNDER my car. Didn't go over any curbs
though.
Don
In a message dated 9/24/2012 5:25:15 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
kb4oer at gmail.com writes:
A 40 foot, 3 inch diameter aluminum tube would be ideal.
Delivery might present a problem.
-Doug
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:37 PM, <DnEMoth at aol.com> wrote:
> Check with irrigation people they have 30 and 40 foot aluminum tubes in 2
> and 3 inch diameter.
> Don W2MPK
>
>
> In a message dated 9/23/2012 6:32:14 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> listread at lwca.org writes:
>
> Alas, the telescoping 30 to 50 foot TV masts seem to have become very
hard
> to find any more, as I reported in the saga of my own beacon in The
> LOWDOWN
> earlier this year. The last time I saw one in a catalog, which has been
> several years ago now, it was nearly $70. They've gone up since! I
> priced
> one through a local hardware store last year that handles Channel
Master,
> and discovered the 40-footer is $130 and the 50-footer is $170, give or
> take. Same with a couple of online sources (eBay was _not_ one of
> those...been burned too many times there...but you might luck out).
>
> Many of the vendors of TV antennas and accessories are no longer with
> us--thanks in no small part to the big (and ongoing) wireless data
> spectrum
> grab that made digital TV a mandated process, not a marketplace
decision,
> thus further driving consumers away from over-the-air reception to cable
> and
> satellite for their local channels. These masts have become a
specialty
> item for the remaining vendors now, They're also heavy and a bit
> cumbersome, despite their ability to telescope.
>
> The 43-foot telescoping ham verticals are much lighter and are not
> necessarily a budget buster, though. You can buy individual tubing
> sections, and/or you may not need the base section either if you already
> have a good insulator.
>
> You can buy suitable tubing at better hardware stores, too. Even if
your
> antenna doesn't telescope, there are ways to get one up in the air.
>
> As I said earlier, the antenna for a Part 15 LowFER is not high-tech.
If
> the mast is sufficiently in the clear, there's not much else you need to
> worry about with it. It's the loading coil and the ground system that
> will
> benefit from all the attention you can realistically give them.
>
> John
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
Lowfer mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list