[Lowfer] WD2XES WOLF Saturday Night

[John Andrews]

Lloyd,

Definitely on 137.294 here...no real possibility of error.

John A.

On 1/28/2012 7:58 PM, lloyd chastant wrote:
> Kinda strange tonite..Itried copy at 137.294 and saw the signal but it
> seemed at about 137.289 so I reset and got this copy
> 2012-01-29 00:49:16>WOLF10  -r 7999.41 -f 289 -t 1.0 -w 0.0000
> t:  24 f:-0.099 a: 0.6 dp: 95.9 ci: 0 cj:  0 F.T14ICXKCZ76T7 ?
> t:  48 f:-0.098 a: 0.5 dp: 93.3 ci:12 cj:276 WD2XES 137.294K -
> t:  96 f:-0.098 a: 0.5 dp: 92.4 ci:12 cj:276 WD2XES 137.294K -
> t: 192 f:-0.098 pm:544.6 jm:409 q:  8.3  8.2 WD2XES 137.294K -
> t: 288 f:-0.098 pm: 1256 jm:409 q: 12.3 12.2 WD2XES 137.294K -
> I guess I may have something strange here
> Lloyd W3NF
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:05 AM, John Andrews<w1tag at charter.net>  wrote:
>
>> Jon,
>>
>> The "f:" is the frequency difference in Hz. Starting with line 192, that
>> should stay steady if WOLF is locked onto the signal. You will see a
>> growth in the SNR reading given by "pm:", and you should see a steady
>> value for the framing indication "jm:" Creep in the frequency reading
>> from line 192 onward could be due to receiver drift. Creep in the
>> framing would be likely due to not having nailed down the correct
>> sampling rate for your computer setup. But with strong signals like
>> this, it'll just plain work.
>>
>> John, W1TAG
>>
>> On 1/28/2012 6:53 PM, JJ wrote:
>>> Fat signal.
>>> Stupid question, "f:" is how far off in freq i AM?
>>> Jon
>>> 2012-01-28 23:47:56>WOLF10  -r 8000 -f 573 -t 1.0 -w 0.0000
>>> t:  24 f: 0.281 a: 0.5 dp: 86.8 ci:13 cj:170 O8IT7YPIJL0B 35 ?
>>> t:  48 f: 0.283 a: 0.4 dp: 98.8 ci:12 cj:170 WD2XES 137.294K -
>>> t:  96 f: 0.281 a: 0.7 dp:103.9 ci:12 cj:170 WD2XES 137.294K -
>>> t: 192 f: 0.283 pm: 2477 jm:621 q:  4.6  4.3 WD2XES 137.294K -
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/28/2012 4:03 PM, John Andrews wrote:
>>>> WD2XES will be running WOLF(10) on 137.294 kHz tonight starting around
>>>> 00 UTC. If CFH comes back on in the interim, I may have to QSY, but they
>>>> appear to have been off all day.
>>>>
>>>> Reports are welcome.
>>>>
>>>> John, W1TAG/WD2XES
>>>> FN42ch
>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>> Lowfer mailing list
>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>>>>
>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Lowfer mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4171 - Release Date: 01/27/12
>> 19:34:00
>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Lowfer mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4171 - Release Date: 01/27/12 19:34:00
>