[Lowfer] Beacon JAM SoCal New Freq 187.015 khz

Ed Phillips evp at pacbell.net
Fri Jan 13 20:47:02 EST 2012


Been copying JAM since he came on around noon but signal is weaker than 
I would expect at that rather short distance. Terrible line noise came 
on at 4:20 but still easy copy through it.  Perfect copy of course but I 
suggest a change in the message would make in much easier to tune in and 
recognize.  The long dashes with wide spacings don't really help at all 
and the repeat time on the whole messaqge is way, way too long.  I'd 
suggest something as simple as
 'JAM JAM JAM DM04uf' followed by a 10 second dash and then repeat 
without much of a gap.  The dash would be long enough to tune on and the 
presence of the message would be a clue that who it was even if too weak 
to copy solidly.  Speed is good.

Ed

Lee wrote:

>Southern CA. You can see the station on youtube. "Amateur Radio Beacon Jam 187khz"
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>  
>
>>From: Ed Phillips <evp at pacbell.net>
>>Sent: Jan 13, 2012 9:39 AM
>>To: "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, &amp;
>>	UK) and MedFer bands" <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
>>Subject: Re: [Lowfer] Beacon JAM SoCal New Freq 187.015 khz
>>
>>Last message sent before finished.  187 is a bad frequency here in SG 
>>because of intermod from 50 kW station on 1430 and only a mile away but 
>>when I think about it probably nothing close is any better.  Where is 
>>JAM?  If you already mentioned it I missed the note.
>>
>>Ed
>>
>>
>>jrusgrove at comcast.net wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Lee
>>>
>>>Frequency is clear at this location in CT. Please provide details on station ... transmitting 
>>>antenna and frequency accuracy in particular.
>>>
>>>Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>From: "Lee" <fccpart15 at earthlink.net>
>>>To: <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
>>>Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 4:20 AM
>>>Subject: [Lowfer] Beacon JAM SoCal New Freq 187.015 khz
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Beacon JAM SoCal New Freq 187.015 khz starting this weekend. My first adjustment to
>>>>avoid PLC's at distant locations.
>>>>Lee
>>>>______________________________________________________________
>>>>Lowfer mailing list
>>>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>>>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>>>>
>>>>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>______________________________________________________________
>>>Lowfer mailing list
>>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>______________________________________________________________
>>Lowfer mailing list
>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>>
>>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>    
>>
>
>______________________________________________________________
>Lowfer mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>  
>


More information about the Lowfer mailing list