[Lowfer] Opera (and more)
JD
listread at lwca.org
Sun Jan 8 03:02:43 EST 2012
>>>Newest version of Opera at....
Can you use it at all without an Internet connection? It would be helpful
to know before I go stuffing any more software onto my marginally adequate
little notebook for field use.
I often kid that WSPR stands for "Web Surfing Passing as Radio," but so far
as I can tell, at least it doesn't force spotting on you. The Internet is
an option that's just not going to be available at my monitoring post for
the foreseeable future, so that's one reason I'd kind of hope more stations
will be using standalone, communication-oriented modes in future..."generic"
WSJT, for instance, instead of WSPR.
The other reason is that one big justification given for 600m ham operation
is its potential for groundwave communication. I would personally define
communication as an exchange of self-contained messages of arbitrary length
and content...not simply highly formatted propagation reports. At the risk
of being a curmudgeon, I really do get the impression some software packages
have more elements of online social networking than than radio operation
behind them.
I've finally been forced to join the late 20th century with regard to
demodulating and decoding a wider range of digital modes lately, but I must
admit, I like to start with a track record of proven results then build from
there rather than opt for the latest novelty. MFSK modes may be able to
achieve worthwhile results, but they are proliferating too rapidly for an
old geezer to keep up with who's sending what--or to know if my software is
even capable of whatever specific variant is being sent at a specific
instance. By the time I click a few buttons to see what works, the sending
station has switched to another mode anyway.
On the other hand, I like to fantasize that more stations might someday
further explore modes that are becoming more 'standardized,' like PSK31 and
its other speeds, with a focus on real-world communication below the AM BCB.
Before having to dig into digimodes myself, I thought PSK31 sounded like
just another sort of trendy deal, but I've since developed an appreciation
for it. Even with the strongest Amtor/Navtex transmissions, I seldom get
more than low-90% decoding accuracy. But Ralph's PSK31 segments as WD2XSH/7
have always given me 100% perfect copy thus far, even during a few moderate
fades.
Sorry for the rant, and I certainly don't mean to put down _any_ hobby
activity anyone enjoys for its own sake, but I've been curious lately where
folks feel the emphasis really lies for future 600 m operation.
John
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list