[Lowfer] New MW Allocation in the U.S. & Questions about LF

[k2ors at verizon.net]

 Les,
 The electric utility companies were concerned that it would interfere with power line carrier transmission and crash the grid.
However shame on the power companies if more than 10 years after 9/11 they are vulnerable to some hams transmitting low power on LF!
 
 
 
 73 Warren K2ORS
 WD2XGJ
 WD2XSH/23
 WE2XEB/2
 WE2XGR/1

 
On 02/15/12, Les Rayburn<les at highnoonfilm.com> wrote:
 
My sincere thanks for everyone who worked hard to achieve the new Medium 
Wave allocation during WARC. I know that this culminates
years of effort.

Can someone refresh my memory on what the objection within the US is to 
the WARC 07 allocation at 135.7-135.8?


-- 
73,

*Les Rayburn, N1LF*
EM63nf
121 Mayfair Park Maylene, AL 35114
6M VUCC #1712
Grid Pirates #222
Life Member Central States VHF

______________________________________________________________
Lowfer mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.htmlLes,
 The electric utility companies were concerned that it would interfere with power line carrier transmission and crash the grid.
However shame on the power companies if more than 10 years after 9/11 they are vulnerable to some hams transmitting low power on LF!
 Les,
 The electric utility companies were concerned that it would interfere with power line carrier transmission and crash the grid.
However shame on the power companies if more than 10 years after 9/11 they are vulnerable to some hams transmitting low power on LF!