[Lowfer] LF: tonight

[Douglas D. Williams]

Well I hope everyone had good luck last night. I got one screen capture,
then sometime shortly after I went to bed, my computer did a windows update
and restarted itself. :-(

But I did get one screen of your DFCW Stephan, and perhaps a bit of a trace
of another station below you.

Despite the clear skies here in TN, my S-meter is hitting 20db over S9
right now, so there must be lightning somewhere fairly close.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33457409/136172Hz%283%29.jpg


Well, off to work!

D. KB4OER

2012/2/2 Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer at iup.uni-heidelberg.de>

> **
> Hi Doug,
>
> I have to smile. It's actually an exciting night.
> There is stronger QSB but nice signal levels between that. Also Mike/G3XDV
> is transmitting and well above the noise. I just saw him on the VE1VDM
> grabber.
> Vernon reported i am audible in Nova Scotia, so that's OK ;-)
> The farer to the west, the closer comes the path to the auroral oval where
> a lot seems to go on these days. But the signal made it to UA0SNV again,
> just got that screenshot from Vasily:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/capt2229.PNG
> It's one step to JA7NI from there and it is a very good indicator for
> possible DX...
>
> 73, GL, Stefan
>
> PS: I switched to DFCW-90 a while ago. Your settings are fine. 90 dot
> normal would be an alternative.
>
>
> Am 03.02.2012 01:20, schrieb Douglas D. Williams:
>
> Switched to QRSS60 (slow).
>
> D.
>
>  On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Douglas D. Williams <kb4oer at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Getting traces of one (perhaps two) signals.....
>>
>> 700Hz = 136.172kHz
>>
>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33457409/cap00000.jpg
>>
>>
>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33457409/cap00001.jpg
>>
>>
>>
>> D. KB4OER
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/2/2 Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer at iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
>>
>>>
>>> Am 02.02.2012 23:48, schrieb Douglas D. Williams:
>>>
>>>  So, 136.172kHz....QRSS 30 second slow?
>>>> I'll be watching.
>>>> That gives me an entire 6Hz of bandwidth in my ARGO window, centered on
>>>> 136.172kHz.
>>>> D. KB4OER
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>  No, QRSS-60. I could also switch to DFCW-90 which may be a bit more
>>> efficient.
>>>
>>> Look at UA0SNV, propagation seems to be better than i expected :-)
>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/47550836/UA0SNV_LF_Grabber.html
>>>
>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>>>
>>>
>>
>