[Lowfer] Using Argo

[Eric Smith]

Ummm ... but is it purely cosmetic?  What about graphic modes?  Hell
and all that?  And "Wm" would be "wM" ... which can be significant ...
remember, as an example, for a while Bill had one letter on one loop,
and the other letter on a different loop, and wanted to compare
signals.




On Dec 5, 2012, at 7:56 PM, "jrusgrove at comcast.net"
<jrusgrove at comcast.net> wrote:

> Okay ... you do it your way. Maybe it's some kind of a southern hemisphere 'inversion'  thing ;~)
>
> Jay
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob" <vk7zl at internode.on.net>
> To: "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, &amp;UK) and MedFer bands" <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 8:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] Using Argo
>
>
>>> And then lower frequencies are at the top of the waterfall and higher frequencies at the bottom ... at odds with what everyone else on the planet is doing.
>> Purely cosmetic.
>>> DFCW is still inverted.
>> There is no defined standard for DFCW.
>> Bob  VK7ZL
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Lowfer mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html