[Lowfer] No luck with - JH
Garry Hess
k3siw at sbcglobal.net
Sat Dec 1 15:12:10 EST 2012
> Ground rods are not a substitute for radials. At lf, they need to be as long as you can make them
and as many as you can afford.
I beg to disagree. Page 3 of The Lowdown, July 1980 article by Ed
Phillips (available for download at
http://www.maxmcarter.com/lwantennas/index.html) cites the following
conclusions of E.A.Laporte's 1952 study of ground systems:
(1) "... radials of length equal to the antenna height are almost as
good as those of infinite length, and that a length of half the antenna
height (outside diameter of radial system equal to antenna height) is
about 2/3 as effective as very great length."
and
(2) "... 2 radials are about half as good as a very large number, and 16
radials are within a few percent of being as good as 112.
Thus, one need not fear that thousands of feet of radials are necessary
to produce a lowfer that can be heard out of the back yard. I'm quite
happy with the performance of my lowfer vertical antenna of 35' height,
15' tophat, and 8 x 35' radials (4 of which are terminated by 4' ground
rods; a pair of 8' ground rods are located at the antenna base).
--
73, Garry, K3SIW, EN52ta, Elgin, IL
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list