[Lowfer] WE2XGR/2 HELL for CW
ToddRoberts2001 at aol.com
ToddRoberts2001 at aol.com
Sun Jan 23 19:17:09 EST 2011
Hi Jay,
Had a chance to watch HELL for CW for a while and I would say
it is a bit better than SLOW HELL. Good fade resistance, static not
too big a problem if narrow filters are used in the receiver. White
letters on a dark background easier to see when signal is in a fade.
Overall a real winner.
I was wondering if you might be able to configure your HELL program
to work at a speed of QRSS3?
That might be a good compromise for good resistance to static and fade
without being painfully slow?
Here is another screenshot using the smaller original ARGO screen :
http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/32051022/view/WE2XGRHELLFORCW.jpg
73 - Todd WD4NGG
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list