[Lowfer] WE2XGR/2 HELL for CW

ToddRoberts2001 at aol.com ToddRoberts2001 at aol.com
Sun Jan 23 19:17:09 EST 2011


Hi Jay,

Had a chance to watch HELL for CW  for a while and I would say
it is a bit better than SLOW HELL. Good fade  resistance, static not
too big a problem if narrow filters are used in the  receiver. White
letters on a dark background easier to see when signal is in  a fade.
Overall a real winner.

I was wondering if you might be able to  configure your HELL program
to work at a speed of QRSS3?

That might be  a good compromise for good resistance to static and fade 
without being  painfully slow?

Here is another screenshot using the smaller original  ARGO screen  :

http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/32051022/view/WE2XGRHELLFORCW.jpg

73  - Todd WD4NGG  



More information about the Lowfer mailing list