[Lowfer] #18 wire
rick kirby
smokinggun at verizon.net
Mon Dec 5 23:23:05 EST 2011
Hi Bill,
Well it was nice of the logging company to hook you up like that. I cant
wait to hear it. Sounds like lots of wire !
I have the same mountain conditions here in the Poconos; all rock and clay.
I wonder if you still planned on testing a loop with a ground screen like
we were discussing a while ago ?
As far as my loop goes; the Rac went up from 1.18 on Friday to 1.38
Saturday ; the day after I elevated the lower leg and trimmed the trees. I
dont expect anything went bad in the TX in that time.It would be quite a
coincidence. It wasnt a drastic change but I just expected it to go down not
up.O h well, maybe my measurements were off before I trimmed but I rechecked
the loop current a few times after trimming and again 2 days ago and all the
readings are the same.
Good luck with the new antenna raising !
Rick "PBO"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Ashlock" <ashlockw at hotmail.com>
To: <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] #18 wire
>
> Hi Rick,
>
> Yah, a bit of a shift in loyalty from TX loops to a vertical (although not
> quite a traditional form of a vertical). The open area just cleared out by
> loggers crys out for a vertical and should give a good A/B comparison of
> the performance of these two antennas. They left a huge birch tree in the
> center of this area and it is about 120ft from the closest tree on my
> property. The plan is to run one rope support end of the "Y" over the top
> of this tree and run the other two rope supports to the tops of two trees
> on my land forming a 120 deg angle between each rope. The Y itself will
> be composed of #12 stranded house wire. A counterpoise with a
> geometrically matching "Y" will be 50ft below this. I will be filling in
> the "Ys" with smaller gauge wire in order to increase the capacity between
> them as much as possible consistent with low cost and low weight. The apex
> of the "Ys" of course will be connected to the vertical element and the
> loading coil will be hanging in the approx ce
> nter of this. The whole antenna will be floating relative to ground
> because of the very poor ground conductivity up here. This pretty much
> described my first vertical on site (5 years ago) except it was an "X"
> antenna instead of a "Y" and was located in the center of my 200ft wide
> lot. The performance of this antenna was quite good (Rac in the order of
> 10 ohms) but I had to remove it soon after its installation to make room
> for my house. So far I have installed the ropes over the tops of two trees
> and should be able to complete the third tomorrow. (BTW I'm still doing
> pretty good with the compound bow - now batting 1000 :) Luckily the
> weather has been good for this project.
>
> About your loop: What you did shouldn't have raised the Rac. Must be
> something very subtle. Are the two lower legs touching anything other than
> insulators? That's the most sensitive area. Recheck the Xmter on the bench
> and also check the resonating caps if nothing else looks out of place.
>
> Bill
>
>> From: smokinggun at verizon.net
>> To: lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 04:38:17 +0000
>> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] #18 wire
>>
>> Wow Bill; I want to see what that looks like and how it performs ! Its a
>> horizontal "Y" ? I guess your feeding it where the 3 legs of the "Y"
>> meet?
>> Do tell!
>>
>> BTW : My loop is doing ok.I trimmed some trees and moved the feed point
>> from the corner to the center of the loop( shouldnt change performance)
>> .That night I was copied by Andy and Doug down in TN ; almost 500 miles!
>> Not
>> bad for a new guy ! For some reason though by trimming the trees away and
>> raising the lower leg from 4 ft up to 8 ft and moving the feedpoint ; my
>> Rac went up ?I was expecting the opposite but what do I know.
>> Keep us informed on your "Y " experiment .Im real curious.
>>
>> 73
>> Rick KA2PBO
>> "PBO" 187.2Khz "or so" qrss60
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bill Ashlock" <ashlockw at hotmail.com>
>> To: <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 4:02 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] #18 wire
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks Warren. I'll have to stop in on my next trip south and/or give
>> > them
>> > a call. This is for the antenna design that uses a tall tree 120ft off
>> > to
>> > the side of my land. This was originally planned to be an "H" antenna
>> > (rotated 90deg) but I found the capacity between top and bottom
>> > sections
>> > to be only about 100pf and not much more with caged conductors. A "Y"
>> > design (looking down from the top) on the other hand has a capacity of
>> > almost 400pf if the "Y" is filled-in with a spider web of smaller ga
>> > wire.
>> > I can use two trees on my land to form the "Y". (This is a Lowfer
>> > antenna,
>> > BTW, fitting inside a 50' x 50' cylinder)
>> >
>> > Bill
>> >
>> >> From: k2ors at verizon.net
>> >> To: lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>> >> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 22:30:33 -0500
>> >> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] #18 wire
>> >>
>> >> Bill,
>> >> Electronic Surplus Sales in Candia, NH has wire on spools at scrap
>> >> prices. Selection varies from day to day, so it might pay to check
>> >> with
>> >> them
>> >> first.
>> >>
>> >> 73 Warren
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Bill Ashlock" <ashlockw at hotmail.com>
>> >> To: <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
>> >> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 10:06 PM
>> >> Subject: [Lowfer] #18 wire
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Does anyone know of a cheep source for #18 bare stranded wire? Need
>> >> > about
>> >> > 500ft for a new Lowfer antenna design.
>> >> >
>> >> > Used to buy so-called 'chandelier wire' at $12 for a 500ft spool at
>> >> > Home
>> >> > Depot but now I'm seeing astronomical prices.
>> >> >
>> >> > Bill
>> >> >
>> >> > ______________________________________________________________
>> >> > Lowfer mailing list
>> >> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>> >> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> >> > Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>> >> >
>> >> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> >> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> >>
>> >> ______________________________________________________________
>> >> Lowfer mailing list
>> >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>> >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> >> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>> >>
>> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________________________
>> > Lowfer mailing list
>> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> > Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>> >
>> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> >
>> >
>> > -----
>> > No virus found in this message.
>> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> > Version: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2102/4652 - Release Date:
>> > 12/02/11
>> >
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Lowfer mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2102/4654 - Release Date: 12/03/11
>
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list