[Lowfer] SAQ in CT

[jrusgrove at comcast.net]

I asked Lars. Here's his response.

____

Well it is strange. Three of the six coils are changed but that was the case already during the
January transmission.

I don´t know the reason for the improvement, but of course I am glad.

_____

The January transmission was received here but not much out of the ordinary. This latest SAQ test
was received some 3 - 6 dB above any previous reception. I had been expecting to hear next to
nothing given the time of day / year of the latest test.


Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ToddRoberts2001 at aol.com>
To: <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] SAQ in CT


> In a message dated 4/14/2011 9:09:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> jrusgrove at comcast.net writes:
>
> Very surprised to have best reception SAQ to date! Receiving setup setup
> similar to previous
> receptions. Short recording of message and sign off  at:
>
> http://www.w1vd.com/capture/SAQ041411A.mp3
>
> Jay W1VD   WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2
>
> Hi Jay, that's a nice recording of SAQ for this time of year. Sounded  Q5
> to my ears.
>
> I missed being able to listen for SAQ today due to work  schedule.
>
> SAQ announced a few months ago they were planning to install  improved
> inductors in their multiple downlead antenna system. Perhaps their  signal
> strength is
> better now if the new inductors have been installed?
>
> 73 - Todd WD4NGG
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html