[Lowfer] Sheilding power cords with aluminum foil ??
Laurence KL1X
hellozerohellozero at hotmail.com
Mon Jan 25 17:54:52 EST 2010
http://www.apcmedia.com/salestools/FLUU-5T3TLT_R1_EN.pdf
http://www.apc.com/products/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=PMP1X%2DA
Im investigating myself but above and I note the APC technical library has good info which can related to
LF operation and the types of issues (some very confusing) - Ive asked APC for a attenuation graph over frequency for the household filter.
Laurence KL 1 in Five
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:44:22 -0700
> From: turner at ussc.com
> To: lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] Sheilding power cords with aluminum foil ??
>
> Since the vast majority of the QRM is being conducted into the power
> line rather than being radiated by the cord, shielding it will have no
> real effect at LF/MF frequencies.
>
> Remember also that at LF/MF frequencies, clamp-on ferrite cores are
> utterly useless as they simply cannot add enough reactance to the line
> on which they are installed to impede signal flow! If you look at the
> specs for such devices, you'll see that they are even of dubious utility
> even at HF, where they may offer only a few 10's of ohms of impedance.
>
> In general, at HF frequencies, snap-on ferrites are often more useful to
> prevent ingress rather than egress. Most susceptible devices do usually
> have *some* amount of intrinsic RF immunity, in many cases a few extra
> 10's of ohms of impedance at the interfering frequency may be all that's
> needed to reduce the RF coming in by several-fold and keep them happy.
> If you are trying to keep some noise from being emitted from a device,
> however, those extra 10's of ohms may not really knock things down too
> much - especially (as is often the case) you need to reduce their
> emissions by 10's of dB!
>
> If you wish to add filtering that is effective at LF/MF frequencies, you
> are talking about needing to add 100's of uH (at least) to whatever line
> is conducting these out. Taking the example of a switching power
> supply, you also need to shunt any RF on that line to the chassis/shield
> ground of that power supply - and at LF/MF frequencies, this will take
> many 1000's of pF to effectively do so.
>
> The practice of a "Pi" or "L" circuit is a good one: From the power
> supply, you first throw inductance in the line to add (preferably) 100's
> of ohms of reactance at the frequency of interest and then you shunt
> whatever remains to ground.
>
> ***
>
> Take an example of a typical computer supply line choke/filter
> combination - about 100 uH and 2200pF.
>
> At 15 MHz, we could see that the 100uH has a reactance of about 9.4k and
> the 2200pF has a reactance of about 5 ohms: A 9k resistor shunted to
> ground by a 5 ohm pretty much shorts out the signal so if everything is
> working properly, this is pretty effective at HF.
>
> At 150 kHz, that same 100 uH has a reactance of about 94 ohms and the
> 2200 pF has a reactance of 500 ohms - a combination that will have
> little effect on the signal coming out of the box.
>
> Considering that a snap-on ferrite core will probably offer well under
> 10 uH of inductance to the line (that's being generous!) and that adding
> that ferried so doesn't add any additional shunt reactance to ground
> (like the cap would) you can see that at LF frequencies, adding that is
> ineffectual. Likewise, if you were to assume that the foil (or even
> coax-braid) shielding would add, maybe, 100pF/foot of capacitance (an
> overly generous amount!) you can also see that that's equally
> ineffective at LF.
>
> If you you need to modify a device that is radiating garbage from the
> power line connection to make it "LF" friendly, do what has already been
> recommended here:
>
> - Take an AC input filter from a dead switching supply. Often on old PC
> supplies, these are a toroid wound with twisted wire - one wire
> connected to each side of the line. They can also take the form of a
> toroid in which wire is wound separately on each half of the toroid.
> Finally, they can also look like a split-bobbin transformer, with a
> winding on each bobbin - but these are less-common.
>
> Having this "dual" choke is important as it forces common-mode RF
> currents to be canceled out. Since there are typically capacitors
> across the two sides of the power line on the "power supply" side of
> this choke, the two sides of the line are essentially shorted out at RF,
> allowing this choke to do its job.
>
> Unfortunately, these chokes often have only have about a hundred uH of
> inductance per leg, but some have far more: I've found that the "split
> bobbin" types (which are, unfortunately, a bit harder to find) usually
> have more inductance - sometimes in the mH range.
>
> - The bypass caps are usually a bit too small for effective work at LF.
> Often, these are 1000-2200pF and as the above example shows, these are
> too wimpy at LF.
>
> Good-quality high-voltage (400 WV or higher for a 120 volt AC mains)
> mylar capacitors in the 0.1-0.47 uF range are pretty easy to find and on
> the "line" side of the bifilar choke, one of these can be put between
> each side of the line (both the "hot" and "neutral") and the case
> ground. It is also a good idea to put one of these on the "power
> supply" side - between the hot and neutral.
>
> Now doing this poses somewhat of a hazard that is, unfortunately, a bit
> hard to avoid: Anytime you put a capacitor between line/neutral and
> ground, you are "lighting up" the ground with the reactive currents of
> those capacitors. If you were to measure between the "lifted" "ground"
> pin on a computer and the earth ground you'd see about 60 volts (half
> the line voltage) of AC - but the current would be low, reactively
> limited by the 2200pF caps inside the computer.
>
> If you have, say, an entire workbench of gear, those types of capacitors
> in each piece can really add up, often causing a 60 volt "bite" if, for
> some reason, your ground wasn't really grounded. You can, therefore,
> imagine that replacing that 2200pF with a 0.22uF capacitor will make
> this even more "bitey"!
>
> Unfortunately, if you *really* need to effectively bypass the power
> supply at LF frequencies, this is hard to avoid - unless you can come up
> with some bifilar chokes that have several 10's of mH of inductance per
> leg which would still allow you to use the smaller (2200pF or so) bypass
> caps!
>
> 73,
>
> Clint
> KA7OEI
>
>
> Andy - KU4XR wrote:
> > What has been the experience from those who have tried this ??
> > The standard 3 prong black computer cord, wrap a small stranded
> > wire around the cord to use as a drain wire, then wrap the cord
> > with a layer of aluminum foil, place a clamp on ferrite core at
> > the outlet end, and at the computer end connect the drain wire
> > to the case, either directly, thru a capacitor, or inductor
> > which ever works, or leave it dis-connected if it makes things
> > worse. It would be a simple method, anyone have any sucess or
> > failure trying it ?? Of course at MW and LF frequencies.
> >
> >
> >
> > Andy - KU4XR - EM75xr - Friendsville, TN.
> > LOWfer Beacon " XR " @ 185.29866 KHz ( QRSS-60 )
> > Coordinates: N: 35* 43' 54" - W: 84* 3' 16"
> > http://www.myspace.com/beaconxr
> > http://webpages.charter.net/ku4xr/
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Lowfer mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390708/direct/01/
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list