[Lowfer] 1750 meter frequency for Part 5?

[jrusgrove at comcast.net]

If you are only interested in audible copy then perhaps Part 5 and Part 15 are compatible in close 
confines. It's a different matter when using Argo. A relatively close in Part 5 can destroy copy of 
a more distant Part 5...let alone a more distant Part 15. Could always give it a try and if a 
problem develops one station can move.

Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Daulton" <k5wms at centurytel.net>
To: <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] 1750 meter frequency for Part 5?


> Warren I suggest 187.5 khz. This is an integer division of 6mhz. With
> an oven the freq could be manipulated to scatter out the stations
> around the new watering hole. I dont think you would bother me at
> 187.492, but I am planning to move to the 185.3 watering hole anyway ,
> or maybe near WEB at 189950 +/- a hz or two. I will have better
> stability when I make any move. With inexpensive DDS available now this
> may be a moot point. I suggest this so others may join you, as on
> 137khz.
>
> Check the catalogs for a common microprocessor freq that, with an
> integer division ,will fall into 160-190hz range.
>
> I dont see why part 15 and part 5 cant co-exist, I copy WEB( and did MO
> when he was on) with 150 ft of separation between my rec and tx
> antennas and opposite side band suppression on rec. Two out of state
> signals of the different levels shouldnt bother each other. Maybe those
> close to you could run desensing trials to check.
>
> One watering hole for part15 and one for part 5 is ok. 187.5 and 185.3
> could be copied with a 2.5 to 3.0 khz bandwidth using the dual argo
> screen technique. Another consideration is to make reception available
> to those with 100 or 10 hz resolution.
>
> Good luck, I will be looking foward to hearing(seeing?) you.
> Paul k5wms
>
> Quoting Warren Ziegler <wd2xgj at gmail.com>:
>> Hello the list,
>>
>> Sorry 1st message bounced (probably due to HTML format)
>>
>> Looking for suggestions for a good frequency in the 160-189 kHz band
>> for a Part 5 beacon/station.
>> Want to protect the Part 15 stations but would like something in the
>> 180-186kHz area so the beacon could be copied in Europe when the
>> station Europe 1 on 183khz takes it's evening break at 0000 UTC.
>>
>> Grabbers are not a consideration now that there are NO active grabbers
>> for 1750 meters.
>>
>> 73 K2ORS
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Mike-WE0H <we0h at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > Question?
>> >
>> > Mike
>> > WE0H/8
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> From: k2ors
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Lowfer mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>
> Paul Daulton K5WMS
> beacon WMS 187.492 khz qrss30/slow 24/7
> Jacksonville,Ar 72076
> em34wu
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html