[Lowfer] "A" for Andover

[Bill Ashlock]

>From Charlie: "I like your Andover ID , especially the length of it"

 

Yes! I think I have just enough frequency deviation for ID purposes and that length, as you point out, is long enough to get a good feel of the prop. variations. Another thing I'm finding interesting is the relative strength of Wm vs A. As the night goes on the "Wm"s seem to gain in strength vs the "A"s, but, again, the sample size is very small, so far. I was telling Garry, off line, a few minutes ago that a mountain ridge up there 'seems' to block the signal to the west, but that's yet to be proven. Possibly the wave angle resulting from the blockage is responsible for the later appearance of the "Wm"s. 

 

Bill
 
> From: cvest at cox.net
> To: lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:51:30 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] "A" for Andover
> 
> I like your Andover ID , especially the length of it . It will be 
> interesting to watch , but it appears that one can "see" the noise or 
> propagation by its integration over that period of time . Interesting .
> 
> Charlie 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html