[Lowfer] TAG decodes
Garry and Linda Hess
k3siw at sbcglobal.net
Thu Jan 29 10:57:27 EST 2009
Beacon TAG on 185.8 kHz Wolf-10 was into NE Illlinois pretty good
overnight. The following decode history (edited) was generated:
2009-01-29 06:09:53 >WOLF10 -r 10800.689 -f 399.92 -t 2.0 -w 0.0000 -ut
06:10:17 f: 0.080 a: 0.2 dp: 80.2 ci:13 cj:445 Q0DESLHRG7A*2JY ?
06:10:41 f: 0.080 a: 0.2 dp: 81.4 ci:13 cj:445 1Z/O12D3BP25??? ?
06:11:29 f: 0.080 a: 0.3 dp: 81.9 ci:11 cj:285 XA13YX/3AWF7V8N ?
06:13:05 f: 0.879 pm:0.832 jm:283 q:-11.8 -6.9 KD0FUMWQLJ1X2.W ?
...
06:21:05 f: 0.000 pm:4.161 jm:839 q: -4.3-10.4 MHA*BOMLR1HIDPI ?
06:22:41 f: 0.000 pm:4.290 jm:839 q: -3.9 -5.2 TAG RAYMOND ME -
06:24:17 f: 0.000 pm:4.350 jm:839 q: -3.6 -5.3 TAG RAYMOND ME -
06:25:53 f: 0.000 pm:4.375 jm:839 q: -3.3 -5.6 TAG RAYMOND ME -
06:27:29 f: 0.000 pm:4.512 jm:839 q: -3.2 -5.8 TAG RAYMOND ME -
06:29:05 f: 0.000 pm:4.626 jm:839 q: -3.0 -8.6 TAG RG???K4LYCA ?
06:30:41 f: 0.000 pm:4.650 jm:839 q: -3.1 -8.1 8.9VASJ1IQPTNZU ?
...
2009-01-29 07:02:50 >WOLF10 -r 10800.689 -f 399.92 -t 2.0 -w 0.0000 -ut
07:03:14 f: 0.081 a: 0.2 dp: 83.5 ci: 0 cj:198 FS4 OXLQTGR96CM ?
07:03:38 f: 0.080 a: 0.3 dp: 83.4 ci:12 cj:302 LA8NCXY9E/V89OB ?
07:04:26 f: 0.080 a: 0.3 dp: 83.4 ci:11 cj:220 K*LMG0.I/VZ1H.J ?
07:06:02 f: 1.230 pm:1.484 jm:951 q:-13.3 -8.2 V.H91KC*/MEBF8B ?
...
07:41:14 f:-0.029 pm:10.72 jm:749 q: -2.4 -7.6 *1Z II*9N*./LG ?
07:42:50 f:-0.029 pm:11.39 jm:749 q: -2.0 -5.6 TAG RAYMOND ME -
07:44:26 f:-0.029 pm:11.68 jm:749 q: -1.8 -5.0 TAG RAYMOND ME -
07:46:02 f:-0.029 pm:11.85 jm:749 q: -1.3 -4.4 TAG RAYMOND ME -
07:47:38 f:-0.029 pm:12.85 jm:749 q: -0.5 -3.4 TAG RAYMOND ME -
07:49:14 f:-0.029 pm:14.65 jm:749 q: -0.3 -3.1 TAG RAYMOND ME -
07:50:50 f:-0.029 pm:16.01 jm:749 q: -0.1 -2.9 TAG RAYMOND ME -
07:52:26 f:-0.029 pm:17.61 jm:749 q: 0.0 -2.7 TAG RAYMOND ME -
07:54:02 f:-0.029 pm:19.68 jm:749 q: 0.4 -2.3 TAG RAYMOND ME -
07:55:38 f:-0.029 pm:21.74 jm:749 q: 0.9 -1.8 TAG RAYMOND ME -
2009-01-29 07:55:47 >WOLF10 -r 10800.689 -f 399.92 -t 2.0 -w 0.0000 -ut
07:56:11 f: 0.080 a: 0.2 dp: 84.9 ci: 1 cj: 0 9Q5U*NIW3B7KD82 ?
07:56:35 f: 0.080 a: 0.2 dp: 84.4 ci: 1 cj: 0 VW9N/GJMDTA4 WY ?
07:57:23 f: 0.080 a: 0.2 dp: 84.0 ci: 5 cj:431 3YPZ528QV/7Q MZ ?
07:58:59 f:-0.029 pm:1.417 jm:662 q: -5.8 -4.2 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:00:35 f:-0.029 pm:3.023 jm:662 q: -2.7 -2.3 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:02:11 f:-0.029 pm:4.315 jm:662 q: -2.2 -1.8 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:03:47 f:-0.029 pm:5.816 jm:662 q: -1.4 -1.3 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:05:23 f:-0.029 pm:7.805 jm:662 q: -0.3 -1.0 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:06:59 f:-0.029 pm:8.781 jm:662 q: 0.2 -0.6 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:08:35 f:-0.029 pm:9.175 jm:662 q: 1.0 -0.7 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:10:11 f:-0.029 pm:9.828 jm:662 q: 1.2 -0.5 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:11:47 f:-0.029 pm:10.26 jm:662 q: 1.4 -0.6 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:13:23 f:-0.029 pm:11.54 jm:662 q: 1.7 -0.9 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:14:59 f:-0.029 pm:13.02 jm:662 q: 2.1 -0.3 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:16:35 f:-0.029 pm:13.34 jm:662 q: 1.9 -0.3 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:18:11 f:-0.029 pm:13.91 jm:662 q: 2.1 -0.6 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:19:47 f:-0.029 pm:14.12 jm:662 q: 2.2 -0.2 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:21:23 f:-0.029 pm:14.48 jm:662 q: 2.5 -0.2 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:22:59 f:-0.029 pm:14.62 jm:662 q: 2.4 -0.4 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:24:35 f:-0.029 pm:14.91 jm:662 q: 2.2 -0.3 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:26:11 f:-0.029 pm:15.09 jm:662 q: 2.4 -0.3 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:27:47 f:-0.029 pm:15.66 jm:662 q: 2.6 -0.1 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:29:23 f:-0.039 pm:15.99 jm:662 q: 2.6 -0.0 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:30:59 f:-0.039 pm:16.24 jm:662 q: 2.5 0.1 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:32:35 f:-0.039 pm:16.82 jm:662 q: 2.6 0.1 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:34:11 f:-0.039 pm:17.14 jm:662 q: 2.6 0.2 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:35:47 f:-0.039 pm:17.24 jm:662 q: 2.4 -0.1 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:37:23 f:-0.039 pm:17.68 jm:662 q: 2.1 -0.3 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:38:59 f:-0.029 pm:17.97 jm:662 q: 2.2 -0.1 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:40:35 f:-0.039 pm:18.96 jm:662 q: 2.2 -0.3 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:42:11 f:-0.039 pm:19.44 jm:662 q: 2.3 -0.2 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:43:47 f:-0.039 pm:19.51 jm:662 q: 2.0 -0.4 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:45:23 f:-0.039 pm:19.92 jm:662 q: 2.0 -0.4 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:46:59 f:-0.039 pm:21.22 jm:662 q: 2.1 -0.4 TAG RAYMOND ME -
08:48:35 f:-0.039 pm:21.40 jm:662 q: 1.9 -0.6 TAG RAYMOND ME -
2009-01-29 08:48:43 >WOLF10 -r 10800.689 -f 399.92 -t 2.0 -w 0.0000 -ut
08:49:07 f: 0.079 a: 0.2 dp: 82.8 ci: 0 cj: 52 9.M00/IIPUV9N.V ?
08:49:31 f: 0.080 a: 0.2 dp: 82.5 ci: 9 cj: 99 ???UYBVPC YPEIY ?
08:50:19 f: 0.080 a: 0.2 dp: 83.0 ci:15 cj:420 KNWMYLWDLWMER5A ?
08:51:55 f:-0.312 pm:1.618 jm:816 q:-12.4 -8.9 OJX57F8E.LF9OD8 ?
...
09:03:07 f:-0.039 pm:6.634 jm:575 q: -3.2 -5.7 Y PL7BT2.B1UG0 -
09:04:43 f:-0.039 pm:8.234 jm:575 q: -2.8 -5.3 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:06:19 f:-0.039 pm:9.596 jm:575 q: -2.7 -5.3 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:07:55 f:-0.039 pm:10.28 jm:575 q: -2.6 -5.0 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:09:31 f:-0.039 pm:11.03 jm:575 q: -2.3 -4.8 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:11:07 f:-0.039 pm:11.06 jm:575 q: -2.2 -7.9 TAG RAYMOND MVR ?
09:12:43 f:-0.039 pm:11.35 jm:575 q: -2.6 -7.3 Y K*JZZXV6MJVBF ?
09:14:19 f:-0.039 pm:12.17 jm:575 q: -2.4 -8.0 IQHATNXATS151W* ?
09:15:55 f:-0.039 pm:12.66 jm:575 q: -2.2 -7.8 RJJK*BIUP0E9PD7 ?
09:17:31 f:-0.039 pm:13.45 jm:575 q: -1.8 -5.5 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:19:07 f:-0.039 pm:13.90 jm:575 q: -1.6 -5.6 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:20:43 f:-0.039 pm:15.85 jm:575 q: -1.1 -4.7 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:22:19 f:-0.039 pm:16.82 jm:575 q: -0.7 -4.2 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:23:55 f:-0.039 pm:17.96 jm:575 q: -0.4 -4.1 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:25:31 f:-0.039 pm:18.69 jm:575 q: -0.3 -4.0 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:27:07 f:-0.039 pm:19.12 jm:575 q: -0.3 -3.7 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:28:43 f:-0.039 pm:19.55 jm:575 q: -0.1 -3.4 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:30:19 f:-0.039 pm:19.83 jm:575 q: -0.2 -3.6 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:31:55 f:-0.039 pm:20.28 jm:575 q: -0.2 -3.7 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:33:31 f:-0.039 pm:20.87 jm:575 q: -0.1 -3.5 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:35:07 f:-0.039 pm:21.45 jm:575 q: -0.3 -3.9 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:36:43 f:-0.039 pm:21.57 jm:575 q: -0.4 -4.2 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:38:19 f:-0.039 pm:21.57 jm:575 q: -0.6 -4.6 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:39:55 f:-0.039 pm:21.86 jm:575 q: -0.6 -4.5 TAG RAYMOND ME -
09:41:31 f:-0.039 pm:22.45 jm:575 q: -0.6 -4.5 TAG RAYMOND ME -
2009-01-29 09:41:40 >WOLF10 -r 10800.689 -f 399.92 -t 2.0 -w 0.0000 -ut
09:42:04 f: 0.080 a: 0.1 dp: 84.9 ci: 3 cj: 0 AK/3ULO .T*C2SY ?
09:42:28 f: 0.081 a: 0.1 dp: 84.8 ci: 5 cj:448 A 86.RHOB*Y5HLL ?
09:43:16 f: 0.080 a: 0.2 dp: 84.6 ci:12 cj:473 23D6XEN5XBHPRYC ?
09:44:52 f: 1.533 pm:0.863 jm:443 q:-14.5 -6.1 CYERJER3KRVV94S -
09:46:28 f:-0.039 pm:1.607 jm:485 q: -7.8 -5.7 X5PC144QHV5*URK -
...
10:10:28 f:-0.039 pm:5.988 jm:485 q: -3.3 -5.8 .O4JWI8K/F1HVT8 -
10:12:04 f:-0.039 pm:6.287 jm:485 q: -2.8 -7.6 TAG RAYMOND OYU ?
10:13:40 f:-0.039 pm:7.128 jm:485 q: -2.6 -7.4 TAG RAYMOND OZJ ?
10:15:16 f:-0.039 pm:7.664 jm:485 q: -2.6 -5.3 TAG RAYMOND OYQ -
10:16:52 f:-0.039 pm:7.972 jm:485 q: -2.5 -6.9 TAG RAYMOND OYW ?
10:18:28 f:-0.039 pm:8.475 jm:485 q: -2.3 -6.6 TAG RAYMOND OYB ?
10:20:04 f:-0.039 pm:8.485 jm:485 q: -2.4 -7.0 TAG RAYMONDFNG5 ?
10:21:40 f:-0.039 pm:8.897 jm:485 q: -2.2 -6.4 TAG RAYMONDFNG6 ?
10:23:16 f:-0.039 pm:9.007 jm:485 q: -2.2 -7.7 5N4??? ZV1UWPA/ ?
...
2009-01-29 10:34:37 >WOLF10 -r 10800.689 -f 399.92 -t 2.0 -w 0.0000 -ut
10:35:01 f: 0.080 a: 0.2 dp: 84.7 ci: 0 cj: 0 2ULBUQ???EFWDAK ?
10:35:25 f: 0.080 a: 0.2 dp: 84.4 ci:11 cj:183 1E33OFMLJGG4J* ?
10:36:13 f: 0.080 a: 0.2 dp: 84.4 ci:15 cj:186 HPGKCKHN20LBLEY ?
10:37:49 f: 1.182 pm:0.985 jm:368 q:-13.5 -8.3 O /FS ON CXO.DQ ?
10:39:25 f:-0.039 pm:1.092 jm:394 q: -7.8 -5.3 SA/???IG/O0NX90 -
10:41:01 f:-0.039 pm:1.521 jm:394 q: -5.9 -7.3 V5HBMLIW2JSSM2J ?
10:42:37 f:-0.039 pm:1.698 jm:394 q: -5.7 -6.8 U1KA6IILXNFE0JC ?
10:45:49 f:-0.039 pm:3.044 jm:394 q: -4.4 -5.3 TAG RAYMOND ME ?
10:47:25 f:-0.039 pm:3.452 jm:394 q: -4.4 -5.0 TAG RAYMOND ME -
10:49:01 f:-0.039 pm:4.163 jm:394 q: -3.7 -5.0 TAG RAYMOND ME -
10:50:37 f:-0.039 pm:4.534 jm:394 q: -3.4 -5.1 TAG RAYMOND ME -
Decoding at 0800Z was unusually quick. At other times decodes vacillated
between success and garble. Frequent, substantial static crashes were
present at those times. Perhaps using the Wolf clipping function would
have helped. Tuning error drift downward was apparent. That may have
been more due to receiver drift than TAG drift.
73,
Garry
K3SIW, EN52, Elgin, IL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/lowfer/attachments/20090129/e4bc383b/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list