[Lowfer] WMS in CT

[PAUL DAULTON]

Jay thats the record so far. I list my speed as qrss 30 out of habit but
 it is closer to qrss 60.
I am using K1EL chip at .02 wpm. Steves newer chips offer .04 wpm. I have
 thought of installing
one of the newer chips and shortening to a two letter id . Dex and Roger
 have had problem getting
full Id due to the length of my ID with qsb. Dex has pictures of my setup
 on http://www.w4dex.com/gallery/WMS
I wonder what you are using for rec and antenna.
>From the reports I have seen propagaion is long. WEB has been down a few
 days. I dont see CV and UWL. I am about
254 from CV and about 330 from UWL. My guess  is we are too close.
Thanks for spending the time looking for me. Before sundown I'll tweak it
 up.
73 Paul Daulton k5wms
-----Original Message-----
From: <jrusgrove at comcast.net>
Sent: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:31:37 -0500
To: <lowfer at mailman.qth.net> 
Subject: [Lowfer] WMS in CT
 
 
First night camped out on WMS frequency.  
 
A number of 'frags' overnight with improved reception around sunrise.
 Switched to QRSS60 just after  
this capture but ran out of darkness. Will try for a brighter, cleaner ID
 for your scrapbook but the  
evidence so far is all but iron clad. I note your frequency to be 2 Hz
 below advertised at 187490  
and it does wander around maybe 0.2 Hz. Hopefully the 'squirgles' will
 remain clear of your  
frequency.  
 
Rough calculation is 1234 miles. Nice going!  
 
http://www.w1vd.com/capture/WMS012209.jpg  
 
Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2  
 
_______________________________________________  
>From the Lowfer mailing list  
Send messages to: Lowfer at mailman.qth.net  
To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer  
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/lowfer/attachments/20090122/572bbf4e/attachment-0001.html