[Lowfer] Whirl Wide WEB

WE0H.Mike we0h.mike at gmail.com
Mon Dec 14 17:02:56 EST 2009


Good deal. I will bug you when I return home next weekend.

That WEB reception looked very audible. That station must have a very 
efficient antenna system. You guys could have had a two way CW chat. 
This might be a good winter season to get on 1750m rather than 600m. I 
have to put up some of that #8 wire from my previous 1750m TX loop. I'm 
good for another 5 years on that band.

Is there a schematic online of that preamp you are currently using? 
Sounds interesting.

Mike


Jay wrote:
> Mike
>
> The BOG is the antenna of choice (toward the west) on 500 kHz. We worked 
> last year on 500 kHz so if you're running a comparable setup there's no 
> reason why we shouldn't be able to work...QSB, static and propagation 
> permitting.
>
> Jay
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "WE0H.Mike"
>
>   
>> Jay,
>>
>> Do you use the BOG when your normally operating 600m or on occasion?
>> Wonder if I call back when your are on the band if you would hear me?
>>
>> Mike
>> WE0H
>>
>>
>> Jay wrote:
>>     
>>> Mitch
>>>
>>> That's the all time best WEB here. Condx have been unusual - great on 
>>> some
>>> paths/times and just so so on others.
>>>
>>> That was the K9AY into the 2N5109 (LT1001A actually) preamplifier - still
>>> the go to antenna for 137/185 kHz. This year I've added a 1000' BOG
>>> (beverage on ground) pointing toward 240 degrees and this antenna is 
>>> about
>>> equal to the K9AY on 137/185 kHz...but beats the K9AY on 500 kHz hands 
>>> down.
>>>
>>> Jay


More information about the Lowfer mailing list