[Lowfer] Re: the Lowfer forum

[riese-k3djc at juno.com]

actually it wasnt,, some one on 185,,,, nuby I believe
the SMRG group is a bit different as they want you to log
reports on their page as to allow input to the FCC

and I hope it works,, too noisy here fer LF but at 500 K
a fairly quiet band,,, I sure,, so far,, using the links to postings
on the new forum but wouldnt log on to see who's on first
whats on second
with the success using Multipsk et all would be a real fun band
for lots of room to play if the FCC allowed,, 

wonder if Field Hell would be in the future

HAR

Bob K3DJC


On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:52:42 +0000 k2ors at comcast.net writes:
> 
> Bob,
> >I noticed that someone has posted to the Forum a listing for a
> >new beacon,
> 
>   Are you referring to W0RW on 480kHz? That's been around for 
> several years!
>  Mostly mentioned on the 600 meter reflector, not here.
> 
> Which brings up another problem - too many e-mail reflectors!
> 
> The LWCA has decided that it doesn't want to deal with
> Part 5 500kHz stations - talk about fracturing the group!
> The 500kHz lists and web page are not interested in 137,160-190
> QRSS etc. 
> 
> The reality is that there is a hell of a lot of overlap!
> Your choice - one forum or 6 different e-mail reflectors (without 
> attachments, of course!)
> 
> 
> 
> my 2c.
> 
> --
> 73 Warren K2ORS
> WD2XGJ     136-140kHz
> WD2XSH/23 505-510kHz
> WE2XEB/2   160-189kHz
> WE2XGR/1 505-515kHz
> 
> FN42hi
> http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm
> _______________________________________________
> >From the Lowfer mailing list
> Send messages to: Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> 
>