[Lowfer] Attachments dropped

[Bill Ashlock]

Mitch,

Thanks, too, from this end.

The W and Ms got reversed for some reason but this time there is no excuse 
because I have receiving gear up there an could have checked before 
departing last night. The upper character is always the vertical so the 
stronger signal, this time the W, was in fact the vertical.

Further thought: Your report gives me more encouragement to add a second, 
but westerly pointing, loop up there so that we can put a better handle on 
the comparison between a loop and vertical of similar size at ~500miles 
distance. Might also be a way of comparing TAG's more favorable soil to a 
mountainous location having very poor soil. BTW, for those not following the 
tests that have been going on since last Fall the loop is pointing SSW and 
would normally be inferior to the vertical as received by Mitch straight to 
the East of Ellsworth.

Bill
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Andrews" <w1tag at w1tag.com>
To: "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, &amp; UK) and MedFer bands" 
<lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] Attachments dropped


> Mitch,
>
> I got your message directly, and thanks very much for the capture. That's 
> good DX for this time of year.
>
> This reflector does not accept any captures, unfortunately.
>
> John A.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>>From the Lowfer mailing list
> Send messages to: Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>