[Lowfer] NA

[Jay Rusgrove]

Stan

As John says it's not unusual to see NA during the daytime although he doesn't normally transmit
during the day much any more. Back several years ago when he was transmitting more frequently he was
visible during the day in the summer months.

MPs signal is off the back of the antenna so his signal is attenuated about 15 dB in that capture.

Jay W1VD / WD2XNS

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stan W1LE" <stanw1le at verizon.net>
To: "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, &amp; UK) and MedFer bands" <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] NA


> Hello Jay,
>
> Interesting.  What is the signal strength of MP vs. the NA ?
> Very distinct start and end.
> Ionized trails would be too short of a wavelength to impact 137 KHz
> propagation.
> Have not had any EMP lately....
> Weatherfronts, if they had an impact, would effect propagation longer.
>
> Could it be a new local NA ?
>
> Stan, W1LE
>
>
>
> Jay Rusgrove wrote:
>
> >Nice midday copy of NA at 1000+  miles. Not sure what's going on with the 'N' though.
> >
> >http://www.w1vd.com/NA031807.jpg
> >
> >Jay W1VD / WD2XNS
> >_______________________________________________
> >>From the Lowfer mailing list
> >Send messages to: Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> >To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> >From the Lowfer mailing list
> Send messages to: Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer