[Lowfer] F_C Comments - Part 15

Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:21:23 -0600

"_d," hm_?

Yes, actually, B_ll was in mind when I carefully chose "corollary" to
arrive at a rectangle from a longitudinal section of the cylinder along
its axis. Further, as I recall, said cylinder was not intended to
enclose the tank coil or other apparatus, but merely provided the
theoretical form and from it the final outline when viewed as a section,
hence the rectangular shape of the perimeter (also square). In this case
a corollary because said shape was inferred from a given form without
further proof. "Induction," Mr. Watson?

P_t_r

>>> [email protected] 03/18/04 12:40PM >>>
_d,
>the group decided (didn't argue beyond a point) that the "15M cylinder

>rule"
>prevailed. The loopers extrapolated that into another geometric
shape,
>hence the 50X50 perimeter corollary."

Didn't the cylinder have a 15M diameter, and hence the l__p (oops, I
mean 
tank coil) fit inside without further corollaries?

W_ld B_ll

_________________________________________________________________
Find a broadband plan that fits. Great local deals on high-speed
Internet 
access. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200360ave/direct/01/ 

_______________________________________________
From the Lowfer mailing list
Send messages to: [email protected] 
To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer