[Lowfer] Sloppy drifter on top of my signal?

Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:07:08 -0600

I asked for 160-190 and the 136kc band. I know of another who asked for
166-166.5kc and the 136kc band. As long as we don't park it up high in the
1750-meter band and talk all night, there shouldn't be any interference
problems. I think the high-powered operations on 1750-meters will work fine
around 166-166.5kc. That way Ralph will have someone else to talk to instead
of himself. Hi hi... It'll be fun to be able to up the power, as needed when
we go for that CW or whatever mode two-way experimental contact. Our group
doesn't seem like the HF type where they would run the full bucket all the
time. There is certainly no need for that especially during the quiet winter
months. Summertime will require a bit of power to make any two-way contacts
but we'll all get along like we do now.

Like in my case being so close to Lyle, Bryce & Roger, if they want to do
some receiving, I certainly will keep it quiet down here for them. We do the
same right now with CW beaconing, as it tends to get wide for ARGO
capturing. Some nights no one runs CW and some nights it doesn't matter, as
we are all transmitting.

I consider the LF bands as the new gentleman's bands, nothing like HF is
now.

Mike>WE0H

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Eric KD5UWL
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Lowfer] Sloppy drifter on top of my signal?

Hi,

I've always assumed you guys were joking about
going QRO in the lowfer "band" with your part 5 licenses -- you are just
kidding around, right?

Probably shows my ignorance, again, but just wondering ...

73
Eric

_______________________________________________