[Lowfer] LRC Meter
Ed Phillips
[email protected]
Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:40:10 -0700
John Andrews wrote:
>
> Ed,
>
> > As for measurements I much prefer a
> > good bridge over the "LCR meters" which are potentially susceptible to
> > producing all sorts of erroneous results. For Q I prefer a Q meter or
> > some form of parallel or series loss resistance measurement.
>
> I'm blessed with having an old General Radio RF bridge (516C - fairly rare).
> The 916A, 916AL and 1606 are more common. They are very handy things to have
> around, and can occasionally be found at decent prices on Ebay. They can be
> a bit cumbersome to use, but do give you the advantage of making
> measurements on the frequency you plan to use.
>
> If you're not trying to make antenna measurements, a Q meter is probably
> easier to use.
>
> John Andrews
John:
Your note prompted me to do an inventory of readily-accessible stuff.
RF:
GR-1600A
Boonton 160A Q-Meter (mint)
Heathkit copy of above (works surprisingly well and lighter)
Boonton 30-200 MHz Q-Meter (name plate gone)
Original Millen Grid Dip Meter
Several Heathkit grid dippers & "Tunnel Dippers"
Home-grown 6 Meter grid dipper mounted on soup can
Several RF signal generators from GR to HP 608D to Heathkit. I'm too
lazy to look at the oldest GR but it's a Navy version which came in a
heavy aluminum case with separate power supply. Uses a type 76
oscillator tube so at latest middle-1930's vintage. Works just fine but
heavy as sin. I've used it a lot for VLF receiver work.
Several counters including giant panel-mount HP 524C with all imaginable
plugins which I'd like to give away - takes up too much space
Audio:
GR 660A (Wooden case, sloping panel, built in 1000 Hz tuning fork)
Electro-measurements ESI-250DA (used most because of size)
Heathkit version of same (works surprisingly well and lighter)
Can't help it but I'm obviously a pack rat who likes good test
equipment but has long since run out of room for it. When I go to the
swap meets I measure the cost of stuff in terms of "where could I put
it". Seeing gorgeous old gear which I've always hungered for at give
away prices. Recently saw a fairly recent and almost new HP network
analyzer for only $100. Had to pass it up.
Should mention that RF measurements are difficult here because of a
couple of local (~1.5 miles) 10 and 25 kW BC stations which give good
readings (>3 volts) on the Q-Meter even with shielded coils!!!! Takes
care to recognize BC QRM from that being measured.
I'll bet you can top this.
Ed