[Lowfer] On the Topic of QSL's

Fri, 14 Nov 2003 21:26:00 -0500

Paul,

A few comments:

1. You aren't making the trip tonight at all, blur or no blur. Wind get cha 
like it got Jay?

2. Note that my capture was made using QRSS10, so the distortion is 3X 
compared to QRSS3.

3. I don't think you are wealthy enough to afford the massive quantity of 
QSL cards it's going to take to to cover all the reports you will, no doubt, 
be receiving with that loop!

TGIF!

Bill A

>From: Lisa Cianciolo <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [Lowfer] On the Topic of QSL's
>Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:12:32 -0800 (PST)
>
>
>Hello Folks,
>
>Concerning  topic of QSL's for the DX'in the Beacon Bands.
>
>Since a good number of reports and captures  of "USA" have been received by 
>the operator,  I was wondering, what is the accepted QSLing practice?
>
>Is it QSL by email/ QSL by snail mail?
>
>Is there a prefere nce?  I am getting these reports and would like to 
>acknowledge the folks doing this?
>
>Comments welcomed.    Thank you
>
>PaulC
>
>W1VLF
>
>
>
>
>--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
>The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
>or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
>to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---
>_______________________________________________
>From the Lowfer mailing list
>Send messages to: [email protected]
>To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger with backgrounds, emoticons and more. 
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_customize