[Lowfer] Re: Group Part-5 license for LF???

Sun, 18 May 2003 19:43:03 -0400

> But it says in Part 97 that this is permissible! What gives??

This was in Connecticut, when I lived there. I was with the state Office of
Emergency management.

As I remember it, they were told they could re-broadcast the audio if it
came via a phone line but could not re-transmit the actual broadcast. The
state paid for an audio feed.

But that was a while ago. They may have relaxed/changed that. The point is
still the same.

Mike
wa1ptc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of W2MXW
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 5:46 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] Re: Group Part-5 license for LF???
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Staines <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Date: Sunday, May 18, 2003 1:00 PM
> Subject: RE: [Lowfer] Re: Group Part-5 license for LF???
>
>
> >I know Ham stations that were issued "Cease and Desist" orders
> from the FCC
> >for "rebroadcasting" the national weather service radio forecasts during
> >tornado (cyclone) watches.
>
> But it says in Part 97 that this is permissible! What gives??
>
> 73, Jon
>
> _______________________________________________
> From the Lowfer mailing list
> Send messages to: [email protected]
> To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer