[Lowfer] BPL comments to the FCC

[Tim Brannon]

>John Davis wrote:
>Tim,
>BPL clearly should be a concern for hams on HF, SWLs,=20
>and even VHF TV viewers, but it is not a threat to LF. =20
>The quoted item -- appears to represent a serious misunderstanding=20
>of the FCC's position regarding the difference between=20
>BPL and PLCs.

John,=20
I stand corrected. After looking at a screen full of snowballs on ARGO =
from my new house this winter, I made a presumption here that was not =
based on the facts. But doesn't the non-threat to LF assume that they =
will keep the BPL data transmitters clean?  The utilities seem to have a =
hard enough time keeping their 60 Hz "transmissions" clean!   :-)

Tim Brannon    KF5CQ


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---