[Lowfer] TAG Back ON

Jay Rusgrove [email protected]
Tue, 01 Jul 2003 08:11:46 -0400


John

Sounds good.

I was pretty impressed with the throughput of PSKAM10 at the advertised 6 wpm.
Most of the time there was nothing audible so 6 wpm under those conditions is
pretty respectable.

Thanks for a signal to look at - TAG. Pickin's are getting pretty slim these
days...

Jay



John Andrews wrote:

> Jay,
>
> > Might be interesting to run more PSKAM10 tests at some point again.
>
> Definitely. The last test showed that you could copy it, I could copy it
> during the day in ME, and Lloyd saw nothing. The last time we went up to
> Maine, I left the rig in Jason mode. Unfortunately, the transmitter glitched
> off just after I got the receiver set up. My recollection from last year is
> that I got perfect daytime copy on Jason, and some partial copy at night.
> I'd like to verify that. Of course, the data throughput on PSKAM10 is
> considerably greater.
>
> John A.
>
> _______________________________________________
> >From the Lowfer mailing list
> Send messages to: [email protected]
> To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer