[Lowfer] Question...

Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:08:43 -0500

Thanks, John.

Mike
wm1ke

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of John Davis
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 8:13 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Lowfer] Question...
>
>
> As I recall, this was one of the possible purposes John Andrews
> mentioned in
> connection with his list of LORAN lines, and why each line is
> identified by
> its associated chain on that page.  Since each site in a chain contributes
> to a given line, its strength signifies propagation quality only in a very
> broad general direction.  A chain  that encompasses the receiving
> site would
> thus be less helpful than a chain farther away, for instance.
>
> We see the occasional reports here that LORAN lines in general seem strong
> or not on a given occasion.  But I think it's an idea that hasn't been
> adequately explored on a systematic basis yet.
>
> John
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Staines <[email protected]>
> To: Lowfer <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:15 PM
> Subject: [Lowfer] Question...
>
>
> >Has anyone ever considered/studied/used Loran lines as a predictor of
> >propagation conditions?
> >
> >Now that I have a fairly decent RX setup here at the winter HQ, I have
> begun
> >to notice that the fade patterns of some beacons coincide with the
> >appearance/disappearance of loran lines. I am wondering if we
> could predict
> >propagation based upon the loran lines we are seeing at any given time.
> >
> >Am I reinventing the wheel (as I often do) ?
> >
> >Mike
> >wm1ke
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >From the Lowfer mailing list
> >Send messages to: [email protected]
> >To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>
> _______________________________________________
> From the Lowfer mailing list
> Send messages to: [email protected]
> To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer