[Lowfer] vertical-ness

Fri, 1 Aug 2003 05:57:18 -0500

Whatever. Did I say it was a beam??? No Way did I say that. I referred to a
beam to talk about changing skip distances. Am I a stupid fuck then??? I
guess so in some peoples mind.

Mike Reid

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of Bill Ashlock
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] vertical-ness

According to Bob:

>other that looking better there should be no change in the signal
>caused by a slanting antenna. Signals that come off the F and E layers
>will really change polarization over time regardless of how they start

Glad there is someone with some antenna sense. If the tilt on a vertical
made any measurable difference wouldn't we have heard about this effect
before now? ........And Mike, this is not a beam antenna!

Bill A

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

_______________________________________________
>From the Lowfer mailing list
Send messages to: [email protected]
To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer