[Lowfer] More 3 in CT
Ashlock,William
[email protected]
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:32:06 -0500
Good deal Jay,
I had already planned on dragging an HP signal generator and precision
attenuators/pads home this evening to check that out. I will run the tests
and let
you know. Let me know what your measurements show.
I will set that ratio to 20db +/- a texas RCH! BTW, is the mad Texan (Bill
C) still following these goins ons?
I would think that daylight hours would be the time for any accurate signal
level measurements from WA and TAG.
Right on!
I dragged the crosshairs across about 20 minutes or so of WA and TAG code
elements and the variation was less than a dB or so. At night it would be
all over the map I would imagine. NC was not nearly as consistant as you
guys.
Well, what can you expect from a guy from NC?
Buzz
Jay Rusgrove, W1VD
"Ashlock,William" wrote:
> Jay,
>
> Good approach! Do you know how accurate the ARGO db measurements are? That
> 18.7 db differential for my two segments may be pretty close. I sort of
> guesstimated it on Monday night when I set it up - was getting late. I'll
> calibrate it exactly tonight.
>
> Bill WA
>
> Running captures this afternoon. Here is what I measured for signal levels
> at
> noon. I spent some time rolling the crosshairs around the code elements to
> find
> the maximum signal level rather than an average.
>
> WA high power -30.2 dB
>
> WA low power - 48.7 dB
>
> TAG - 41.9 dB
>
> NC - 46.0 dB
>
> I was worried about agc action in Argo having an effect. Based on WA
> measurements at his two power levels that may not be a concern. I will
have
> captures for you tonight.
>
> *********************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this e-mail message has been scanned for
> the presence of known computer viruses by the MessageLabs Virus
> Control Centre. However, it is still recommended that you use
> local virus scanning software to monitor for the presence of viruses.
> *********************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
_______________________________________________
Lowfer mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
*********************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this e-mail message has been scanned for
the presence of known computer viruses by the MessageLabs Virus
Control Centre. However, it is still recommended that you use
local virus scanning software to monitor for the presence of viruses.
*********************************************************************
*********************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this e-mail message has been scanned for
the presence of known computer viruses by the MessageLabs Virus
Control Centre. However, it is still recommended that you use
local virus scanning software to monitor for the presence of viruses.
*********************************************************************